Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume I
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
This, alleged disassociation of Ruff and Romberg from the “crimes
committed exclusively by Rascher” is in complete contradiction to the
acts of these defendants during the experiments, which after all speak
much louder than their present testimony. Neff testified that Romberg
personally witnessed at least five deaths during the experiments, and
that he made no effort to stop them nor did he even protest after the
event. (_Tr. p. 619._) Romberg admitted seeing three deaths and that he
knew that five to ten other murders took place in his absence. (_NO-476,
Pros. Ex. 40._) The first death Romberg saw, he said, occurred in April.
He reported this to Ruff. _Yet the experiments were not discontinued._
They went on to the end of June and still more deaths occurred which
Romberg saw. _To say the least of it, these defendants made themselves a
party to murder by continuing the experiments._ This is true no matter
how innocent they may have been up to the first death. They were duty
bound to stop the experiments immediately, remove the chamber, and force
a court martial of Rascher. They did none of these simple and obvious
things. They did not for the very reason that deaths were expected from
the very beginning and were a part of the experimental plan. Romberg saw
these men die and did absolutely nothing. It was within his power to
save them at the time. He said he was operating the electrocardiograph.
He knew precisely by their heart action when the subjects were in danger
of dying. He also knew this from his knowledge of reaction to high
altitudes. He could see and read the pressure gauges. He could have
turned the pressure down and saved their lives by simply moving the
gauge which was within arm’s reach. He was a bigger man than Rascher.
Force could have been used if necessary. Not only did he do nothing
while the helpless victims died before his very eyes, but he assisted in
the autopsies.
After all these murders had occurred and were known to them, Ruff and
Romberg still went on. They issued a joint report on the experiments in
the name of Ruff, Romberg, and Rascher in July 1942. (_NO-402, Pros. Ex.
66._) They were still collaborating with this admitted murderer and gave
him the cover of their scientific reputation. Romberg received a medal
for his work in the experiments on the recommendation of Rascher.
(_1607-A-PS, Pros. Ex. 65._) Romberg was still supporting Rascher in
September 1942 and was to have made an oral report to Milch on the
experiments with Rascher. He wrote a memorandum on Rascher’s behalf
explaining that the report was not given because Milch was unable to
receive them at the scheduled time. This same memorandum, signed by
Romberg, proves that _he was anxious to continue high-altitude
experiments with Rascher and asked for Milch’s permission_.
He wrote:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account