Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume I
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
“Oberstarzt Kalk stated that he was willing to report to the
State Secretary (Milch) our wishes concerning the distribution
of the report and the continuation of the experiments. * * *
Oberstarzt Kalk had transmitted, still on 11 September, our
wishes concerning distribution and confirmation of the
experiments to the State Secretary. The State Secretary had
approved the distribution schedule, and said that a continuation
of the experiment was not urgent.” (_NO-224, Pros. Ex. 76._)
In the meantime, the murderous freezing experiments had been started
with the Luftwaffe team of Holzloehner, Finke, and Rascher. Ruff,
Romberg, and Weltz all heard the report of those experiments in
Nuernberg in October 1942. (_NO-401, Pros. Ex. 93._) Hippke himself
wrote his special thanks to Himmler on 8 October 1942, and said: “When
the work will need once more your sympathetic assistance, may I be
allowed to get in touch with you again through Stabsarzt Dr. Rascher?”
(_NO-289, Pros. Ex. 72._)
* * * * *
_Analysis of the Experiments_
The experiments at Dachau in the field of high-altitude research were
conducted to determine human reactions to altitudes above 12,000 meters.
The defendant Romberg stated that four series of experiments were
conducted (_a_) slow descent without oxygen, (_b_) slow descent with
oxygen, (_c_) falling without oxygen, and (_d_) falling with oxygen.
(_NO-476, Pros. Ex. 40._) The first two tests were designed to simulate
descent with parachute open while the latter two a free fall from an
airplane before the parachute opens. As pointed out in Dr. Rascher’s
first interim report on the experiments, an additional problem was to be
solved, namely, the determination whether the theoretically established
norms pertaining to the length of life of human beings breathing air
with only a small portion of oxygen and subjected to low pressure
correspond with the results obtained by practical experience. This
interim report of Rascher’s states as follows:
“2. Experiments testing the length of life of a human being
above the normal breathing limits (4, 5, 6 km.) have not been
conducted at all, since it has been a foregone conclusion that
the human experimental subject (Versuchsperson-VP) would suffer
death.”
The experiments conducted by myself _and Dr. Romberg_ proved the
following:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account