Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume I
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
“Experiments on parachute jumps proved that the lack of oxygen
and the low atmospheric pressure at 12 or 13 km. altitude did
not cause death. Altogether 15 extreme experiments of this type
were carried out in which none of VP died. Very severe bends
together with unconsciousness occurred, but completely normal
functions of the senses returned when a height of 7 km. was
reached on descent. Electrocardiograms registering during the
experiments did show certain irregularities, but by the time the
experiments were over the curves had returned to normal and they
did not indicate any abnormal changes during the following days.
The extent to which deterioration of the organism may occur due
to continuously repeated experiments can only be established at
the end of the series of experiments. _The extreme fatal
experiments will be carried out on specially selected VP’s
otherwise it would not be possible to exercise the rigid control
so extraordinarily important for practical purposes._” [Emphasis
supplied.] (_1971-A-PS, Pros. Ex. 49._)
Thus, it is clear that the experiments were planned and executed with
the _intention_ that some were to terminate fatally. This report covered
the period up to the first week in April and mention of deaths and
autopsies is made. This quite obviously was the instance when Romberg
says he saw his first death and autopsy, although he tends to place the
date as the latter part of April. (_NO-476, Pros. Ex. 40._) If the
experiments had been stopped there the lives of many subjects would have
been saved.
The defendants argue that, while the experiments may have killed
persons, they did not involve torture and pain. This is on the theory
that the subjects lost consciousness before any sensation of pain. This
anomalous defense is completely disproved by the photographic exhibits
showing the expressions of pain of the subjects. (_NO-610, Pros. Ex.
41._) as well as the defendants’ own report on the experiments.
(_NO-402, Pros. Ex. 66._) The reaction of one subject was described in
terms such as “severe altitude sickness, spasmodic convulsions”. In a
self-experiment by Romberg and Rascher, the latter’s reactions were
described as follows:
“After 10 minutes stay at this altitude, pains began on the
right side with a spastic paralytic condition of the right leg
which increased continually as though Ra’s [Rascher’s] whole
right side were being crushed between two presses. At the same
time there were most severe headaches as though the skull were
being burst apart. The pains became continually more severe so
that at last the discontinuation of the experiment became
necessary.” (_NO-402, Pros. Ex. 66._)
There is no case on record where an experiment on an inmate was
discontinued because of pain.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account