Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume I
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
Ruff and Romberg lay great stress on the point that deaths are not
mentioned in the joint report of 28 July 1942 of Romberg, Ruff, and
Rascher. This, of course, is a very understandable omission, but it in
no way proves that they are not responsible for those murders. Indeed,
the joint report of 28 July 1942 (_NO-402, Pros. Ex. 66_) is identical
with Rascher’s report of 11 May 1942 (_NO-220, Pros. Ex. 61_) except for
the specific mentioning of the deaths. For example, paragraph 3 of the
Rascher report is a summary of part III-1, pages 3 to 18, and part
III-2, pages 18 to 19 of the joint final report. Paragraph 4 of
Rascher’s report contains results set out in part III-4, pages 21 to 22,
of the joint final report. Paragraph 5 of Rascher’s report is identical
with part III-3, pages 19 to 21, of the joint final report. Paragraph 6
of the Rascher report where the pervitin experiments are mentioned is
alluded to in the pervitin data in the joint final report on page 18.
Paragraph 7 of the Rascher report contains the conclusions incorporated
in the joint final report and gives details on the gas bubble data which
are referred to on pages 16 to 18 of the joint final report, but from
which is omitted reference to the autopsy results of the murdered
prisoners. These various passages were compared by the witness Ivy and
he concluded that they refer to the same subject matter. (_Tr. p.
9097._)
Ruff attempts to explain the omission of mention of deaths in the final
report on the ground that the deaths did not occur as a result of their
experiments on rescue from high altitudes (i. e., parachute descending
tests), but rather in Rascher’s own experiments with which they had
nothing to do (i. e., prolonged stay at high altitudes). (_Tr. p.
6592._) It has already been proved that the basic premise to this
spurious argument is completely false, since Ruff and Romberg themselves
were not interested in sojourn at high altitudes. The self-experiments
of Romberg and Rascher were just such tests and they are specifically
mentioned in the final report. These involved a stay of 30 to 40 minutes
at altitudes between 12 and 13.5 kilometers (39,400 to 44,290 feet). But
so also is the minor premise wrong. _Deaths were deliberately brought
about in the course of the parachute descending tests._ In these tests
it had been noted that the subjects suffered from spasmodic and clonic
convulsions together with paralysis. This is reported in paragraph 3 of
Rascher’s memorandum of 11 May 1942 on the experiments and also on pages
13 through 18 of the final report. In his memorandum, Rascher stated:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account