Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume I
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
“To find out whether the severe psychic and physical effects, as
mentioned under No. 3, are due to the formation of embolism, the
following was done: After relative recuperation from such _a
parachute descending test_ had taken place, however before
regaining consciousness, some VP’s were kept under water until
they died. When the skull and the cavities of the breast and of
the abdomen had been opened under water, an enormous amount of
air embolism was found in the vessels of the brain, the coronary
vessels, and the vessels of the liver and the intestines, etc.”
[Emphasis supplied.] (_NO-220, Pros. Ex. 61._)
_This proves beyond any doubt that murders were committed in the
parachute descending tests of Ruff, Romberg, and Rascher._ Ruff again
tried to deceive the Tribunal by testifying that it was substantially
impossible for air embolism to form in parachute descending tests. This
is obviously disproved by the statement of Rascher quoted above and by
the reference in the final report, already mentioned above, which
alludes to this same problem. But the lie was also squarely nailed by
the expert witness Ivy, who testified that it was possible for air
embolism to form in subjects who were at altitudes above 12,000 meters
(39,400 feet) only 3 minutes, that is to say, subjects who bailed out at
15,000 meters. Bubbles may form as low as 30,000 feet. (_Tr. p. 9102._)
Thus, the defense that no deaths occurred during the experiments
concerning rescue from high altitudes is completely spurious.
Moreover, it should be noted that while the joint final report does not
describe any of the death cases, it also _does not deny_ that deaths
occurred. On page 25 of the original, it says: “In conclusion, we must
make it particularly clear that, in view of the extreme experimental
conditions in this whole experimental series, no fatality and no lasting
injury _due to oxygen lack occurred_.” (_NO-402, Pros. Ex. 66._) The
deaths described in Rascher’s report quoted above _were not due to lack
of oxygen_ but were deliberate killings to investigate air embolism.
But even the experiments which Ruff, Romberg, and Weltz admit were
planned and performed under their responsibility were highly dangerous
to the life and health of the subjects. Both Ruff and Romberg agreed
that 12,000 meters was the upper limit of safety and that experiments of
the type they performed above that altitude were hazardous. The
description of the reaction of the subjects as set forth in the final
report proves that the subject suffered severe convulsions and prolonged
periods of disorientation. The expert witness Ivy pointed out that the
experiments described in the final report of Ruff, Romberg, and Weltz
were highly dangerous for the following reasons:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account