Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume I
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
During his direct examination on 13 December 1946 the witness Vieweg
mentioned a series of various experiments which were performed at the
Dachau concentration camp. Referring in particular to the high-altitude
experiments there, which alone can be considered in the indictment
against Dr. Ruff, he states firstly that high-altitude experiments with
the low-pressure chamber were performed on 10 patients; “for these
experiments frequently patients and also male nurses were used who
during the experiments were seen in the corridor of the adjacent
hospital ward.”
By this Vieweg apparently wanted to point out that these “patients” and
“also the nurses” were not volunteers. These 10 “official experimental
subjects” had been well fed and supplied with smokes, but in addition to
these 10 so-called “exhibition patients”, a large number of people had
been selected from the camp who were again and again sent to the
high-altitude experiment institute. That happened to a block leader who
probably had pneumonia a few hours later and ended in the sick bay
mortuary. The same happened in the malaria department of the witness
Vieweg. One day a patient who had some differences with Zill, the leader
of the camp, concerning protective custody, was sent to the experimental
institute, and he (Vieweg) found him in the mortuary the next day. He
(Vieweg) knows by hearsay that, “a great number of patients who took
part in these experiments died, and ended up in the sick bay mortuary.”
(_German Tr. p. 476._)
Between the lines of this rather obscure and vague statement one may
read that, according to Vieweg’s statement, these further experimental
subjects, and especially those who had died during the experiments, did
not belong to the 10 “official experimental subjects” and had not been
volunteers. However, in the direct examination by the prosecution the
witness Vieweg did not express himself explicitly about this alleged
compulsion of the so-called experimental subjects.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account