Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume I
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
During the cross-examination by the defense counsel of Dr. Romberg, the
witness Vieweg explained his expression, the “10 exhibition patients”.
(_German Tr. p. 485._) The 10 selected patients who were used for the
high-altitude tests had been accommodated in a special room and had been
well nourished; they had been exhibited, and they had been presented to
Himmler during one of his visits. Himmler made them big promises; if
they survived, they would be set free * * * these 10 patients had been
drawn into the experiments * * * they had told him (Vieweg) that they
were very exhausted by the whole affair, but as far as he could remember
“they all survived” (_German Tr. pp. 486, 489_). On being questioned the
witness Vieweg repeatedly stated (_German Tr. pp. 486, 487, 489_), that
as far as he could remember Dr. Rascher had carried out the experiments
himself. The only thing Vieweg could state about participation of
“Luftwaffe officers” in these high-altitude experiments, was that some
Luftwaffe officers “had also been there”. But he could not say anything
about the actual participation of the Luftwaffe officers. From the
description on page 501 (German Transcript) these two gentlemen of the
Luftwaffe certainly were not identical with Buff and Romberg. He himself
(Vieweg) had only talked with these 10 official experimental subjects,
the so-called “exhibition patients”, but not with any of the other
experimental subjects. He himself had never observed that these other
prisoners were used for high-altitude tests, but he had been told about
it frequently. Vieweg repeatedly stated that the 10 official
experimental subjects had still been alive at the end of the experiments
(_German Tr. p. 489_), that no deaths had occurred among them.
So much for the statement of the witness Vieweg. It is, of course,
unreliable because it does not establish a clear distinction between the
high-altitude experiments authorized by Ruff and carried out with the
cooperation of Dr. Romberg, and other experiments in the low-pressure
chamber which Rascher undertook by order of Himmler, without the
authorization or previous knowledge of Dr. Ruff and without the
cooperation of Dr. Romberg. This distinction, which is of decisive
importance in judging this case, only appears in Vieweg’s statement
insofar as the 10 official experimental subjects (the so-called
“exhibition patients”) were exclusively used for the first experiments
(Ruff-Romberg-Rascher), whereas other prisoners were used for the other
experiments (by Rascher alone). Of course, the significance of this
distinction was not clear to Vieweg at that time and could not be
observed by him because Vieweg did not know anything at all about Dr.
Ruff’s activity and since he did not know anything at all about the
agreements which had been reached between Dr. Ruff and Dr. Rascher.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account