Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume I
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
However, the further assertions of the witness Neff suffer from the same
shortcomings as those of the witness Vieweg; for Neff also did not know
that only part of the high-altitude experiments in Dachau were carried
out with the approval of Dr. Ruff and Dr. Romberg; nor did Neff have any
knowledge of the agreements made by the participating physicians, and he
therefore treated all high-altitude experiments equally, without
distinguishing whether or not Dr. Ruff had agreed to them that there
“were 180 to 200 inmates who participated in high-altitude experiments”
(_German Tr. p. 656_) and that “during the altitude flight experiments,
70 to 80 people lost their lives.” These figures may be correct, but
they refer to the whole of the Dachau low-pressure chamber experiments;
that is, they also include the experiments which Dr. Rascher made on his
own authority, without the prior knowledge of Dr. Ruff, and in which
alone all the fatalities occurred; while in the legitimate
experiments—that is, those approved by Dr. Ruff—no fatality occurred
at all. Of course, Neff could not know all this. As he said himself it
was impossible for him to distinguish “from whom the order came for the
individual experiment, and in whose interest the experiment was made.”
(_German Tr. p. 715._)
The same shortcoming is demonstrated by Neff’s testimony with regard to
the nationality of the experimental subjects (_German Tr. pp. 656, 657_)
and the manner of their “selection”. However, Neff’s testimony does show
that the selection of the experimental subjects was carried out in two
different ways: For the “_dangerous experiments_” Rascher ordered the
subjects through the local headquarters, and they were produced by the
SS; they were therefore people condemned to death (_German Tr. p. 663_),
for the “_serial experiments_”. On the other hand, and “for most of the
other experiments which took place, the people were brought to the
experimental station from the blocks, that is, from the camp” (_German
Tr. p. 657_) by the block leaders. (_German Tr. p. 663._) These “serial
experiments” were obviously the experiments approved by Ruff, and Neff
expressly establishes that “_volunteers reported for these
experiments_”! (_German Tr. pp. 657, 712._) He even gives the reasons
why the prisoners volunteered: As Rascher, and Himmler too, had promised
various inmates that, “if they, participated in the experiments, they
would be given a better labor assignment”, and as Himmler promised that
they might even be released, volunteers reported to Rascher on their own
initiative as he went through the camp, without any special efforts
being necessary to find volunteers (_German Tr. p. 657_).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account