Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume I
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
There can be no doubt that these volunteers, estimated by Neff to number
about 10, are identical with the 10 “official experimental subjects” or
“exhibition patients” mentioned already by the witness Vieweg, and it is
noteworthy that Dr. Ruff, too, in his testimony always spoke of 10 or
12, or at the most 15 persons from the very beginning (of course he did
not count them himself), who were regularly called in for the
high-altitude experiments, and whom he saw himself when he was once
present to observe and check the experiments in Dachau. This number Dr.
Ruff had mentioned at a time when Neff’s and Vieweg’s testimony was not
yet available. He therefore could not have anticipated that these
witnesses would confirm his figures as correct.
To be sure, the witness Neff testified in another place (_German Tr. p.
666_) that the first 10 experimental subjects were not volunteers. But
this statement is obviously in direct contradiction to his other
testimony which, in the last analysis implied—and could not be
interpreted otherwise—that the so-called “10 official experimental
subjects” were those prisoners who had voluntarily offered themselves,
who were given all possible privileges in return, who were promised
rewards for their service by Rascher as well as by Himmler, and who were
repeatedly reassured that nothing would happen to them during the
experiments. This whole presentation would be incomprehensible if one
were to assume that these 10 persons were involuntary subjects as well,
that they were simply ordered to take part in the experiments, forced to
participate, for them all this would not have been necessary at all,
since at that time nobody in a concentration camp would have thought of
troubling himself about these people, if they had been forced against
their will to take part in the experiments.
In a concentration camp, according to the opinion of Himmler and his
men, 1,000 people were of no consequence. Therefore, if efforts were
made to obtain these inmates for the experiments, and to get them
willingly, if even a Himmler found kind words to say to them and
promised them rewards, then as we know today, this can only be explained
by the assumption that even in concentration camps, for some reason, it
was desirable to obtain voluntary subjects for the experiments and to
induce them to go through the experiments voluntarily. This assumption
is not refuted by the contrary assertion of Neff (_German Tr. p. 666_).
For 1½ days, during his examination on 17 and 18 December 1947, Neff did
not know that these first 10 experimental subjects had not been
volunteers. For 1½ days he did not dare to make such an assertion here
in the witness box, and only during the cross-examination did he finally
go so far as to make this assertion, thereby completely overthrowing his
previous statements.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account