Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume I
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
1. In the Summary Report Ruff-Romberg-Rascher of 28 July 1942, it is
“expressly stated that in the whole series of experiments no death and
likewise no permanent oxygen deficiency damage occurred.” (_NO-402,
Pros. Ex. 66._) In direct contradiction to this appears to be, at least
at first glance, the intermediary report which Dr. Rascher alone made on
his experiments on 5 April 1942 to the Reich Leader SS Himmler
(_1971-A-PS, Pros. Ex. 49_) and also the following secret report, which
likewise Dr. Rascher alone sent to Himmler on 11 May 1942. (_NO-220,
Pros. Ex. 61._) These two special reports by Dr. Rascher prove that in
the experiments described by Rascher alone several deaths occurred.
The explanation of the apparent contradiction is shown clearly by the
presentation of evidence: In the experiments authorized by Dr. Ruff and
carried out with his approval not a single death occurred. Only the
arbitrary experiments which Rascher carried out without the approval of
Dr. Ruff and against his will, and which were ordered by Himmler, were
deadly.
This can be seen from Rascher’s intermediary report of 5 April 1942.
(_1971-A-PS, Pros. Ex. 49._) It falls into two parts.
In the first part Dr. Rascher describes the experiments carried out with
Dr. Ruff’s approval. He states expressly, “the experiments conducted by
myself and Dr. Romberg,” and he confirms that even “in a total of 15
extreme experiments, none of the experimental subjects died. Severe
high-altitude sickness with unconsciousness occurred; however, the
subject was always fully capable of action when approximately 7 km. was
attained in the descent.”
In the second part, Rascher then describes his arbitrary experiments of
which Ruff knew nothing, and was permitted to know nothing. This second
part of the report is much more extensive and detailed than the first.
That can be explained without difficulty because the experiments
mentioned in this second part were carried out by Rascher himself; here
he could describe the “merit” of the results he apparently gained all by
himself. From this second part he obviously also hoped for complete new
results for science, which he emphasized in the accompanying letter to
Himmler of 5 April 1942, and he was obviously very proud that following
his suggestions (as he emphasized) such “interesting standard
experiments” were carried out. All this referred exclusively to the
arbitrary experiments mentioned in the second part of the report, which
Rascher carried out alone without the assistance of Dr. Romberg and
without the authorization and previous knowledge of Dr. Ruff.
(_1971-A-PS, Pros. Ex. 49._)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account