Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume I
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
Rascher himself made this distinction in his report (_1971-A-PS, Pros.
Ex. 49_): He contrasts in the second part of his report the “extremely
dangerous experiments” with the “experiments carried out by myself
(Rascher) and Romberg,” while he specially asked for an “SS doctor from
the camp as witness” for the arbitrary experiments of the second part of
his report, as “I carried out these experiments by myself.” But surely
Dr. Rascher had his reasons for specially requesting “a camp doctor as a
witness” for these experiments (which are described in the second part
of his report), but intentionally kept Dr. Romberg away. Dr. Rascher
indicates these reasons in his accompanying letter of 5 April 1942,
talking about difficulties which the Luftwaffe created for him up to
that time, whose removal he hopes for by the intervention of SS Fuehrer
Sievers. These difficulties which hindered the research work of Rascher
were discussed in various other documents which concerned the use of the
low-pressure chamber and its return to Dachau, which the SS tried to
arrange but never succeeded.
If Dr. Rascher in his intermediary report (_1971-A-PS, Pros. Ex. 49_)
emphasized that “only continuous experiments are fatal at heights above
10.5 km.”, this plainly confirms, in Dr. Rascher’s own words, what Ruff
and Romberg stated from the very beginning, that two kinds of
high-altitude experiments were carried out in Dachau with the
low-pressure chamber. The one kind, which Dr. Romberg took part in and
Dr. Ruff knew about, was carried out completely humanely and without any
pain, and nothing happened; and the other kind, which Rascher carried
out alone by order of Himmler, without Romberg and without the previous
knowledge of Dr. Ruff, to which at one time an SS doctor was even asked
to attend as a witness and which caused several fatalities.
This result is confirmed by the second report, which Rascher again alone
(without the participation of Dr. Ruff and Dr. Romberg) submitted to
Himmler, dated 11 May 1942, as a secret report (_NO-220, Pros. Ex. 61_).
He describes here the experiments which he carried out jointly with Dr.
Romberg and again states: “On the average, the experimental subjects
were in complete accord of their actions at 12-13 km.; no disturbances
of any kind in the general condition occurred in any of these
experiments,” and even less, of course, a fatality. Only among the
experiments described under figures 6 and 7 of this secret report of
Rascher’s did fatalities occur, and that “during a continued
high-altitude experiment, for example after half an hour in an altitude
of 12 km.” But these experiments (according to figures 6 and 7) were the
arbitrary experiments in which Rascher had other aims in mind, which had
nothing to do with Ruff’s problem of “saving from high altitudes,” and
which were carried out by Rascher alone.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account