Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume I
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
It would therefore be quite wrong to attribute to Dr. Ruff and Dr.
Romberg the intention of wanting to suppress something in their final
report of 28 July 1942. (_NO-402, Pros. Ex. 66._) For it is a proven
fact that not only Himmler was informed by Rascher of the cases of death
which had occurred, but that Dr. Ruff had also reported the cases of
death for which Dr. Rascher was guilty, to his supreme superior, the
Inspector of the Medical Service [of the air force], Dr. Hippke. For
this same reason he had caused the low-pressure chamber to be removed
from Dachau and had asked the witness, Dr. Hippke, to consent to this.
These proven facts show that Dr. Ruff did not conceal anything and had
nothing to conceal. The fact that the cases of death were not mentioned
in the final report of 28 July 1942 has therefore nothing to do with any
concealment but is only due to the fact that those experiments which had
fatal results had nothing whatsoever to do with the experiments of Dr.
Ruff and Dr. Romberg and their problem.
For the same reasons it is not surprising at all that Dr. Ruff did not
inform Dr. Weltz of the fatal accidents during the special experiments
of Rascher. Weltz was neither Ruff’s superior nor his subordinate, and
at the time when Dr. Ruff learned of the deaths which had occurred
during Rascher’s experiments, Dr. Rascher had already been transferred
from the Weltz Institute.
* * * * *
The defense, therefore, arrives at the following conclusion:
Dr. Ruff only did what his superiors ordered him to do. If they have
failed, they should be taken to account.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account