Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume I
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
It is also interesting that Rascher still mentions the partial
assistance of Dr. Romberg in his first report (of 5 April 1942)
(_1971-A-PS, Pros. Ex. 49_) but does not say anything more in the final
second report (of 11 May 1942), (_NO-220, Pros. Ex. 61_) where he
described the affair as though he alone had carried, out the
experiments. Compare page 81, line 21: “Experiments carried out by
myself”; or page 79, lines 15-16: “_My_ heart experiments * * * that a
very big sphere of work opened up for _me_,” etc. By that Rascher has
clearly expressed that he did not have any assistance from Dr. Romberg
in the experiments he thought particularly valuable, when he explains as
particularly valuable his heart experiments and his observations
concerning air embolism. Those were all experiments in which Ruff and
Romberg had not the least interest, in which they never participated,
and for which they would never have risked the health and the life of an
experimental subject.
Even specialists like Dr. Ruff and Dr. Romberg could never understand
the scientific or other aim which Rascher had in mind in the case of
those arbitrary experiments with fatal endings. Even the layman can
easily recognize the basic difference between the two categories of
experiments. The legal experiments which had been authorized by Dr. Ruff
were always restricted to a very short period of a few moments; but the
fatal experiments of Dr. Rascher were, as he emphasized himself,
continuous experiments without oxygen, therefore experiments lasting
over 30 minutes. It is easily understandable that experiments of such a
length without the administration of oxygen may be fatal. To prove this
it would not have been necessary to sacrifice even one single human life
in these experiments. Serious research workers like Dr. Ruff and Dr.
Romberg had therefore never carried out and never authorized such
experiments. That was also well known to Rascher, and this explains the
fact as stated by Neff (_German Tr. pp. 668, 670, 671_) that Rascher
kept Dr. Romberg intentionally away from his arbitrary experiments;
furthermore that he even carried out his experiments at night to keep
them secret from Dr. Romberg, and that he also did not ask Romberg to
sign his intermediary report of 5 April 1942, nor his summarizing secret
report of 11 May 1942, which Romberg would surely have refused to do.
* * * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account