Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume II
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
It was my mistake that I stayed in the post where fate had placed me and
in which I had hoped to be able to do good for our people and my
profession. It would often have been simpler to give up this post when I
began to realize, step by step, the depravity of the Third Reich. If I
did not do so, but stayed at my post until the bitter end, I did this
because I considered it my duty, especially in the hard times of total
war, and because again and again I succeeded either in protecting the
medical profession from harm or in preventing crimes against humanity.
Even today I would have to consider it cowardice if I had left my post
in 1941 or 1942 only to bring myself to safety or to evade threatened
responsibility.
I feel myself free of the guilt of ever having committed or furthered
crimes against humanity.
H. Final Statement of Defendant Mrugowsky[40]
My attorney and I made every effort during my examination on the witness
stand and by means of the considerable evidence which we submitted to
refute the charges which have been raised against me, just as much as we
tried to assist in ascertaining the truth.
The outcome of the trial and the evidence against me is in the hands of
the Tribunal and the closing brief, and in the reply to comprehensive
documentation of the prosecution. I am firmly confident on the basis of
this trial that this high Tribunal will examine the evidence objectively
and carefully. Thus in my final speech I merely would like to draw your
attention to the fact that my life in its entirety was solely devoted to
my profession and my science. It was my aim, not by any means to
represent some political ideology, but to go to the university and to
reach the position of a free and independent doctor and scientist.
The prosecution has charged us, the defendants, with destructive
tendencies which were supposed to have been the causes of our actions. I
know that I am free of such tendencies. They never occurred to my
collaborators and myself at any time. In the Waffen SS too, the troops
of which were among the bravest divisions of the German Armed Forces,
such tendencies never played a part.
As far as my own concepts of the ethical duties of the doctor are
concerned, they are contained in my book regarding medical ethics, and I
believe always to have acted according to the principles of that book
and lived according to them. My life, my actions, and my aims were
clean. That is why now that at the end of this trial I can declare
myself free of personal guilt.
I. Final Statement of Rudolf Brandt[41]
Now, after this trial has reached its final stage, my conscience is
confronted with the question of whether I consider myself guilty or
innocent. My responsibility, in my opinion, is to be tested by a
threefold question:
First, did I participate in the experiments directly and
actively?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account