Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume II
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
Second, did I at least have any knowledge of the criminal
character of the experiments on human beings?
Third, what, if I had known, could have been my attitude towards
Himmler?
What my basic opinion is of crimes against humanity I did not only
declare myself on the witness stand but this has also been testified to
by a very competent foreign witness, a Swedish medical counsellor, Felix
Koersten.
Before this Tribunal and in the full knowledge of what I say I confess
that I abhor—and did abhor—any crime against humanity in the years
past and during my activity as a so-called personal Referent of Himmler.
But I also frankly declare that perhaps during the course of these last
years my way of thinking was not always in my conscious mind as it is
today. But I never participated in a crime against humanity knowingly,
intentionally, or with premeditation when passing on the letters,
orders, etc., which Himmler issued to third persons, and the result of
which was the commission of cruelties on human beings.
I am confident that from the evidence and from the content of the
various defense affidavits the Tribunal will be convinced that in truth
my real sphere of power did in no way correspond to the face value of my
official position. My real sphere of power was extremely small. It did
not exceed that of a well-paid stenographer in the office of an
influential man in Germany. If the Tribunal were to start from this
fact, it would approach reality much closer than the prosecution did in
its indictment.
I got into contact with Himmler when I was a young, immature man who
came from a family in modest circumstances. Nothing else but my ability
as a stenographer, which I had obtained through my industry, was the
reason for that, and this was my position until the last days of the
German collapse, in spite of promotions in rank. At that time I was only
too glad to get that job because it enabled me to support my parents
financially.
When I started work with Himmler, I got, without intermediate stages,
into an agency, the chief of which was to combine, among other
functions, the highest executive powers in his hands a short time
afterwards.
I am convinced that I would not sit here under a grave indictment if I
had had the opportunity to continue my education, if I had made a start
in a subordinate agency, and had risen little by little into a higher
position. Unfortunately, I have always been a lone wolf as long as I
lived, and I never was fortunate enough to have an older friend who
could have corrected my political inexperience and my gullibility.
If, however, through all those years, I represented Himmler’s ideology,
I did so only because I did not know the criminal part of Himmler’s
character. Since I lived, so to speak, divorced from the world around me
and was only devoted to my more than plentiful work, I only learned
after the collapse what stupendous crimes are to be booked on Himmler’s
account.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account