Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume II
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
In this connection, with reference to the experiences which I have just
described, I am forced to say how on the other hand it calmed and
strengthened me, and gave me confidence to see with what wisdom, calm,
and patience this high Tribunal stood above matters and disclosed a
conduct of trial in which one could feel sheltered; all my friends, who
fought in the secret resistance movement with me and repeatedly attended
this trial in the audience, share these sentiments with me.
I have explained to you, your Honors, for what reasons I was in
immediate, direct contact with the NSDAP and the SS. I have told you how
I always tried to prevent the Ahnenerbe from becoming involved in
medical research. This attempt failed, due to the ambitious attitude of
Himmler. Only on the strength of my own feelings had I to find an
attitude with regard to this new question of experiments on human
beings. I did not approve of them, and I attempted to take the
consequence, which could only be that I immediately resigned from my
post as the Reich manager of the Ahnenerbe. I think the testimony of the
witness Hielscher, in this stand, and the affidavits from witness
Deutelmoser, witness Dellmann, witness Schmitz, and others prove beyond
doubt that I had the true intention of resigning from the Ahnenerbe. And
these witnesses have also clearly testified why I didn’t do so, not
because of personal ambition, not for reasons of comfort, or for what
other low reasons might be attributed to me in this point. It was due to
the persistent urging on the part of my political friends that I
remained, in order to serve further the task which had taken me to the
NSDAP and the SS. Inwardly I rejected contact with human experiments
even as I refused to be a follower of the NSDAP and of the ideology they
represented. Outwardly, I had to live up to the name of a National
Socialist if I was to hold on to the political ideal to which I had
devoted myself since 1929 and not endanger it. In his affidavit, witness
Niebhausen, who was the most important member in the circle of the
secret German resistance, and who has acted on behalf of Dr. Kempner
too, and who is obviously a personality beyond reproach, says that his
illegal activity which continued for five years would have been quite
impossible without my assistance. I do not, indeed, know what the
prosecution is prepared to recognize as being a resistance against the
Nazi regime, if not even such activities as these. It is not necessary
to relate again all the details which have been testified to in this
courtroom.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account