Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume II
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
That in true recognition of the consequences which might be daily
expected for myself and my family I devoted myself to resistance,
continued in it undaunted, and never abandoned it, is now the only
reason why I find myself in this dock. For that reason, I look forward
to the judgment of this Tribunal with confidence, due to my conviction
that I have lived for a good cause and acted on it, on behalf of
something which—then as today—filled me with true belief.
L. Final Statement of Defendant Rose[44]
Mr. President, may it please the Tribunal, the scientists who are among
the defendants in this trial are confronted with a principal difficulty,
the fact that purely scientific questions have been made political,
ideological questions by the prosecution. In the opening speech by the
Chief of Counsel, General Taylor, the political and ideological nature
of the indictment has been expressed as clearly as possible.
A subject of the personal charges against myself is my attitude toward
experiments on human beings ordered by the state and carried out by
other German scientists in the field of typhus and malaria. Works of
that nature have nothing to do with politics or with ideology, but they
serve the good of humanity, and the same problems and necessities can be
seen independently of any political ideology everywhere, where the same
dangers of epidemics have to be combated.
Just as Claus Schilling, in his malaria research, had to make
experiments with human beings, before him and after him malaria
scientists of various nations had to carry out experiments on human
beings. Just as Haagen, on his own initiative, but with the approval of
competent authorities of the state, tested the value of a new, living
typhus vaccine, before him that was done in the course of fighting
plague by your great compatriot, Richard B. Strong, when he experimented
on natives of the Philippines, who were not American citizens, with the
approval of your government.
Just as Dr. Ding, on the instruction of the highest and decisive
authorities of the German civilian health administration, tested the
value of the typhus vaccine on humans in times of greatest typhus
danger, others have done so before him in less pressing emergencies,
sometimes in agreement with, sometimes upon the instruction of their
governments.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account