Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume II
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
A letter written by the defendant Sievers to the defendant Rudolf
Brandt, dated 11 April 1944, points to the fact that Karl Brandt knew of
still other such experiments. The letter states, that in accordance with
instructions he, Sievers, had contacted Karl Brandt, at Beelitz, and had
reported to him concerning the activities of a certain Dr. Hirt, who the
evidence shows had been experimenting with Lost gas upon concentration
camp inmates at Natzweiler. In the letter, Sievers states, further, that
Karl Brandt had told him that he would be in Strasbourg in April and
would then discuss details with Dr. Hirt.
Knowledge of the conduct of at least some of the experiments was
confirmed by Karl Brandt when he testified in his own behalf. He stated
that pursuant to competent authority he had engaged in studies
concerning defense measures against poison gas. He admitted receiving a
report from Hirt, and that one reading the report could reach the
conclusion that human beings had been experimented upon in connection
with injuries from Lost gas.
FREEZING, MALARIA, BONE, MUSCLE AND
NERVE REGENERATION AND BONE TRANSPLANTATION,
SEA-WATER, STERILIZATION,
AND TYPHUS EXPERIMENTS
The evidence does not show beyond a reasonable doubt that Karl Brandt is
criminally responsible on account of the experiments with which he is
charged under these specifications.
The defendant Karl Brandt certainly knew that medical experiments were
carried out in concentration camps upon human subjects, that the
experiments caused suffering, injury, and death. By letter bearing date
26 January 1943 Karl Brandt wrote to Wolff at the Fuehrer’s (Hitler’s)
headquarters asking if it were possible to carry out “nutritional
experiments” in concentration camps. The nature of the desired
experiments does not appear, nor does the evidence show whether or not
such experiments were ever made. The letter, however, indicates Brandt’s
knowledge of the fact that human subjects could be made available for
experimentation.
Defendant Rudolf Brandt, by letter dated 4 September 1944, wrote
Baumert, evidently a member of Himmler’s staff, stating that Karl Brandt
had telephoned and requested that Himmler direct that 10 prisoners from
Oranienburg should be made available as of the next day for two days to
test a certain drug. The letter stated that the prisoners would not be
injured by the test.
It appears from an official note filed by Kliewe of the Army Medical
Inspectorate, dated 23 February 1944, referring to a conversation with
the defendant Blome on that date, that experiments concerning biological
warfare connected with plant parasites, etc., had been made; that up to
that date no experiments had been conducted in the field of human
medicine; but that such experiments were necessary and were in
contemplation. The memorandum continues:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account