Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume II
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
“Field Marshal Keitel has given permission to build;
Reichsfuehrer SS and Generalarzt Professor Brandt have assured
him of vast support. By request of Field Marshal Keitel the
armed forces are not to have a responsible share in the
experiments, since experiments will also be conducted on human
beings.”
It is significant that Hitler’s Chief of Staff should deem it advisable
to direct that the Wehrmacht should have nothing to do with experiments
on human subjects.
EUTHANASIA
Defendant Karl Brandt is charged under counts two and three of the
indictment with criminal activities in connection with the euthanasia
program of the German Reich, in the course of which thousands of human
beings, including nationals of German occupied countries, were killed
between 1 September 1939 and April 1945.
On his own letterhead Hitler, at Berlin, 1 September 1939, signed a
secret order reading as follows:
“Reichsleiter Bouhler and Dr. Brandt, M.D., are charged with the
responsibility of enlarging the authority of certain physicians
to be designated by name in such a manner that persons who,
according to human judgment, are incurable can, upon a most
careful diagnosis of their condition of sickness, be accorded a
mercy death.”
Bouhler was holding a high office in the NSDAP. He was not a physician.
The foregoing order was not based on any previously existing German law;
and the only authority for the execution of euthanasia was the secret
order issued by Hitler.
The evidence shows that Bouhler and Karl Brandt, who were jointly
charged with the administration of euthanasia, entered upon the duties
assigned them in connection with the setting up of processes for
carrying out the order. A budget was adopted; the method of determining
candidates for euthanasia was established; a patients’ transport
corporation was organized to convey the selected patients to the gassing
chambers. Questionnaires were prepared which were forwarded to the heads
of mental institutions, one questionnaire to be accomplished concerning
each inmate and then returned to the Ministry of the Interior. At the
Ministry the completed questionnaires were examined by so-called
experts, who registered their professional opinions thereon, returned
them to the appropriate office for final examination, and orders were
issued for those patients who by this process were finally selected for
extermination. Thereafter the condemned patients were gathered at
collection points, from whence they were transported to euthanasia
stations and killed by gassing.
Utmost secrecy was demanded of the executioners throughout the entire
procedure. Persons actively concerned in the program were required to
subscribe a written oath of secrecy and were warned that violation of
that oath would result in most serious personal consequences. The
consent of the relatives of the “incurables” was not even obtained; the
question of secrecy being deemed so important.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account