Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume II — John Shaqi
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume II
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
The most obvious kind of opposition was offered by the two great
Christian churches. How much and how often were the antichrist and his
false prophets not preached against, how many clergymen of all
confessions were sent to prisons, penitentiaries, concentration camps,
nay, to death? It is true, the churches could venture forth more openly
than other people. For they did not intend to participate in a
_forcible_ removal of the system, in the killing of its leaders and
representatives, in the fight with arms. But the nonecclesiastical
resistance groups had realized that the Nazi dictatorship could not be
overthrown without violence; they were not subject to the
political-philosophical impediments and restrictions of the churches,
they could not throw off the mask until the day of action had dawned. Up
to that time they were condemned to be silent, they had to camouflage,
acting on the old principle of all conspirators: “Never speak of your
aim, but always think of it!” If they had forgotten this principle,
sooner or later unquestioningly they would have been betrayed by a spy
and liquidated by the Gestapo. They would never have got as far as
action. Did not the group round Stauffenberg act in this way too? Who
knew of its existence before the bomb burst in Hitler’s headquarters on
20 July 1944? The same was the case with all the other resistance groups
which unfortunately no longer had the possibility of acting and some of
which were traced and secretly killed in spite of this.
The fact that all of them existed is proved, however, by the small
number of publications: the pamphlets of Emil Henk, of Franklin L. Ford
and other authors, and Neuhaeusler’s book, “Cross and Swastika”.
But downright classical witnesses are the numerous bloody victims whom
the People’s Court of Justice [Volksgerichtshof] and the Gestapo had
sent to the concentration camps and to death.
One of these groups was the group around Hielscher, a member of which
was the defendant Sievers.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account