Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume II
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
Neff’s testimony is corroborated in large part by the affidavits of the
defendants Rudolf Brandt and Becker-Freyseng, by the testimony of the
witnesses Lutz, Michalowsky and Vieweg, and by the documentary evidence
in the record. In the Sievers’ diary, there are numerous instances of
Sievers’ activities in the aid of Rascher. On 1 February 1943 Sievers
noted efforts in obtaining apparatus, implements and chemicals for
Rascher’s experiments. On 6 and 21 January 1944 Sievers noted the
problem of location. Rascher reported to Sievers periodically concerning
the status and details of the freezing experiments.
It is plain from the record that the relationship of Sievers and Rascher
in the performance of freezing experiments required Sievers to make the
preliminary arrangements for the performance of the experiments to
familiarize himself with the progress of the experiments by personal
inspection, to furnish necessary equipment and material, including human
beings used during the freezing experiments, to receive and make
progress reports concerning Rascher, and to handle the matter of
evaluation and publication of such reports. Basically, such activities
constituted a performance of his duties as defined by Sievers in his
letter of 28 January 1943 to Rudolf Brandt, in which he stated that he
smoothed the way for research workers and saw to it that Himmler’s
orders were carried out.
Under these facts Sievers is chargeable with the criminal activities in
these experiments.
MALARIA EXPERIMENTS
Details of these experiments are given elsewhere in this judgment. These
experiments were performed at Dachau by Schilling and Ploetner. The
evidence shows that Sievers had knowledge of the nature and purpose of
these criminal enterprises and supported them in his official position.
LOST GAS EXPERIMENTS
These experiments were conducted in the Natzweiler concentration camp
under the supervision of Professor Hirt of the University of Strasbourg.
The Ahnenerbe Society and the defendant Sievers supported this research
on behalf of the SS. The arrangement for the payment of the research
subsidies of the Ahnenerbe was made by Sievers. The defendant Sievers
participated in these experiments by actively collaborating with the
defendants Karl Brandt and Rudolf Brandt and with Hirt and his principal
assistant, Dr. Wimmer. The record shows that Sievers was in
correspondence with Hirt at least as early as January 1942, and that he
established contact between Himmler and Hirt.
In a letter of 11 September 1942 to Gluecks, Sievers wrote that the
necessary conditions existed in Natzweiler “for carrying out our
military scientific research work”. He requested that Gluecks issue the
necessary authorization for Hirt, Wimmer, and Kieselbach to enter
Natzweiler, and that provision be made for their board and
accommodations. The letter also stated:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account