Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume II
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
The Ding diary shows that, subsequent to this meeting, experiments were
conducted at Buchenwald at the instigation of the defendant Rose. The
entry under date of 8 March 1944, which refers to “typhus vaccine
experimental series VIII”, appears as follows:
“Suggested by Colonel M. C. of the Air Corps, Professor Rose
(Oberstarzt), the vaccine ‘Kopenhagen’ (Ipsen-Murine-vaccine)
produced from mouse liver by the National Serum Institute in
Copenhagen was tested for its compatibility on humans. 20
persons were vaccinated for immunization by intramuscular
injection * * *. 10 persons were contemplated for control and
comparison. 4 of the 30 persons were eliminated before the start
of the artificial injection because of intermittent sickness * *
*. The remaining experimental persons were infected on 16 April
44 by subcutaneous injection of 1/20 cc. typhus sick fresh blood
* * *. The following fell sick: 17 persons immunized: 9 medium,
8 seriously; 9 persons control: 2 medium, 7 seriously * * *. 2
June 44: The experimental series was concluded 13 June 44: Chart
and case history completed and sent to Berlin. 6 deaths (3
Copenhagen) (3 control). Dr. Ding.”
When on the witness stand Rose vigorously challenged the correctness of
this entry in the Ding diary and flatly denied that he had sent a
Copenhagen vaccine to Mrugowsky or Ding for use at Buchenwald. The
prosecution met this challenge by offering in evidence a letter from
Rose to Mrugowsky dated 2 December 1943, in which Rose stated that he
had at his disposal a number of samples of a new murine virus typhus
vaccine prepared from mice livers, which in animal experiments had been
much more effective than the vaccine prepared from the lungs of mice.
The letter continued:
“To decide whether this first-rate murine vaccine should be used
for protective vaccination of human beings against lice typhus,
it would be desirable to know if this vaccine showed in your and
Ding’s experimental arrangement at Buchenwald an effect similar
to that of the classic virus vaccines.
“Would you be able to have such an experimental series carried
out? Unfortunately I could not reach you over the phone.
Considering the slowness of postal communications I would be
grateful for an answer by telephone * * *.”
The letter shows on its face that it was forwarded by Mrugowsky to Ding,
who noted its receipt by him 21 February 1944.
On cross-examination, when Rose was confronted with the letter he
admitted its authorship, and that he had asked that experiments be
carried out by Mrugowsky and Ding at Buchenwald.
The fact that Rose contributed actively and materially to the
Mrugowsky-Ding experiments at Buchenwald clearly appears from the
evidence.
The evidence also shows that Rose actively collaborated in the typhus
experiments carried out by Haagen at the Natzweiler concentration camp
for the benefit of the Luftwaffe.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account