Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume II
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
From the exhibits in the record, it appears that Rose and Haagen
corresponded during the month of June 1943 concerning the production of
a vaccine for typhus. Under date 5 June 1943 Haagen wrote to Rose
amplifying a telephone conversation between the two and referring to a
letter from a certain Giroud with reference to a vaccine which had been
used on rabbits. A few days later Rose replied, thanking him for his
letters of 4 and 5 June and for “the prompt execution of my request.”
The record makes it plain that by use of the phrase “the prompt
execution of my request” was meant a request made by Rose to the Chief
of the Medical Service of the Wehrmacht for an order to produce typhus
vaccine to be used by the armed forces in the eastern area.
Under date 4 October 1943 Haagen again wrote Rose concerning his plans
for vaccine production, making reference in the letter to a report made
by Rose on the Ipsen vaccine. Haagen stated that he had already reported
to Rose on the results of experiments with human beings and expressed
his regret that, up to the date of the letter, he had been unable to
“perform infection experiments on the vaccinated persons.” He also
stated that he had requested the Ahnenerbe to provide suitable persons
for vaccination but had received no answer; that he was then vaccinating
other human beings and would report results later. He concluded by
expressing the wish and need for experimental subjects upon whom to test
vaccinations, and suggested that when subjects were procured, parallel
tests should be made between the vaccine referred to in the letter and
the Ipsen tests.
We think the only reasonable inference which can be drawn from this
letter is that Haagen was proposing to test the efficacy of the
vaccinations which he had completed, which could only be accomplished by
infecting the vaccinated subjects with a virulent pathogenic virus.
In a letter written by Rose and dated “in the field, 29 September 1943”,
directed to the Behring Works at Marburg/Lahn, Rose states that he is
enclosing a memorandum regarding reports by Dr. Ipsen on his experience
in the production of typhus vaccine. Copy of the report which Rose
enclosed is in evidence, Rose stating therein that he had proposed, and
Ipsen had promised, that a number of Ipsen’s liver vaccine samples
should be sent to Rose with the object of testing its protective
efficacy on human beings whose lives were in special danger. Copies of
this report were forwarded by Rose to several institutions, including
that presided over by Haagen.
In November 1943, 100 prisoners were transported to Natzweiler, of whom
18 had died during the journey. The remainder were in such poor health
that Haagen found them worthless for his experiments and requested
additional healthy prisoners through Dr. Hirt, who was a member of the
Ahnenerbe.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account