Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume II
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
Blankenburg, Brack’s deputy, replied to Himmler’s letter and stated that
Brack had been transferred to an SS division, but that he, Blankenburg,
as Brack’s permanent deputy would “immediately take the necessary
measures and get in touch with the chiefs of the main offices of the
concentration camps.”
A Polish Jew testified before the Tribunal that while confined in
Auschwitz concentration camp he was marched to Birkenau and forcibly
subjected to severe X-ray exposure and was castrated later in order that
the effects of the X-ray could be studied.
A French physician of Jewish descent who was confined at Auschwitz from
September 1943 to January 1945, testified that near Auschwitz was
Birkenau camp where people were sterilized by SS doctors. About 100 male
Poles who had been sterilized at Birkenau were attended by the witness
after the operation. Later this group was castrated by the camp
physicians.
The record contains other evidence from which it is manifestly plain
that sterilization by means of X-rays was attempted on groups of persons
who were painfully injured thereby; and that castration followed the
X-ray procedures.
Brack’s part in the organization of the sterilization program with full
knowledge that it would be put into execution, is conclusively shown by
the record.
EUTHANASIA PROGRAM
The Euthanasia Program, which was put into effect by a secret decree of
Hitler on the day that Germany invaded Poland, has been discussed at
length in the judgment in the case against Karl Brandt.
Brack contends that he was basically opposed to this program and that,
on occasion, he assisted certain of his Jewish friends to escape from
its consequences. But be that as it may, the evidence is that whatever
sentiments Brack may have entertained toward individual members of the
race, he was perfectly willing to and did act as an important
administrator in furthering the Euthanasia Program. After it had gotten
under way, he wrote letters to various public officials, explaining to
them how to keep the matter secret and to allay the public sentiment
against the program.
This much is shown by Brack’s own statements. As a witness on the stand
he testified that while at first he did not understand the full import
of the program, he decided, after a talk with Bouhler, to collaborate in
carrying out the assignment and to execute Bouhler’s orders.
He participated in the initial meetings called for the purpose of
placing the project in operation. He was present at meetings of the
experts, as well as the administrative discussions. He often acted as
Bouhler’s representative, frequently making decisions which called for
the exercise of personal judgment and a wide latitude of discretion.
Brack admitted that such were his activities in the program, that one
might well have come to the conclusion that he was the influential man
in euthanasia.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account