Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume II
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
As Bouhler’s deputy he addressed a meeting at Munich, where he explained
the purpose of Hitler’s decree and mentioned the draft of a law which
was being prepared to give complete legislative sanctify to
euthanasia—a law, incidentally, which was never in fact enacted. He
represented Bouhler in April of 1941 at a meeting attended by Nazi
judges and prosecutors. He testified that the Ministry of Justice had
become considerably embarrassed because of the Euthanasia Program, and
that he was present at the meeting for the purpose of imparting
information concerning the salutary features of euthanasia to those who
were present.
Brack gave the Tribunal considerable information concerning the method
of extermination by euthanasia, stating that the program was so designed
as to render the process inconspicuous and painless. In December 1939,
or January 1940, Brack, Bouhler, Conti, and some other doctors were
present at the administration of euthanasia to four experimental
subjects. The victims were led into a gas chamber which had been built
to resemble a shower room. The patients were seated on benches and
poisonous gas was let into the chamber. A few moments later the patients
became drowsy and finally lapsed into a death sleep without even knowing
they were being executed. On the basis of this execution “Hitler decided
that only carbon monoxide was to be used for killing the patients.”
According to Brack these persons were not Jews, because, as Bouhler had
explained to him, “the philanthropic action of euthanasia should be
extended only to Germans.”
The evidence is plain that the euthanasia program explained by the
defendant, gradually merged into the “Action 14 f 13,” which, briefly
stated, amounted to an extermination of concentration camp inmates by
methods and agencies used in euthanasia. One of the prime motives behind
the program was to eliminate “useless eaters” from the scene, in order
to conserve food, hospital facilities, doctors and nurses for the more
important use of the German Armed Forces. Many nationals of countries
other than Germany were killed.
Brack’s direct connection with and participation in the execution of
euthanasia is conclusively proved by the evidence in the record.
MEMBERSHIP IN A CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION
Under count four of the indictment the defendant Brack is charged with
being a member of the organization declared criminal by the judgment of
the International Military Tribunal, namely, the SS. The evidence shows
that Brack became a member of the SS in 1929, and voluntarily remained
in that organization until the end of the war. As a member of the SS he
was criminally implicated in the commission of war crimes and crimes
against humanity, as charged under counts two and three of the
indictment.
CONCLUSION
Military Tribunal I finds and adjudges the defendant Viktor Brack guilty
under counts two, three and four of the indictment.
BECKER-FREYSENG
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account