Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume II — John Shaqi
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume II
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
Pieter Schalker testified before the Dutch Bureau for the Investigation
of War Crimes in Amsterdam that Hoven played an exceptionally evil role
and had innumerable deaths on his conscience owing to completely
inadequate medical attention. In later years, when it became obvious
that Germany would be defeated, he changed his attitude towards the
inmates. (_NO-1063, Pros. Ex. 328._) When Schalker was interrogated by
the commissioner of the Tribunal on the motion of defense counsel, he
amplified his statement by saying that Hoven stole the food which was
furnished for the experimental subjects in Block 46 and also obtained
other items such as shoes, toys, and women’s clothing.
The testimony of the affiant Ackermann, who was an inmate in the
pathological department under Hoven, proves that Hoven participated in
the customary brutal crimes in concentration camps. He said—
“Dr. Hoven stood once together with me at the window of the
pathological section and pointed to a prisoner, not known to me,
who crossed the place where the roll calls were held. Dr. Hoven
said to me: ‘I want to see the skull of this prisoner on my
writing desk by tomorrow evening.’ The prisoner was ordered to
report to the medical section, after the physician had noted
down the number of the prisoner. The corpse was delivered on the
same day to the dissection room. The postmortem examination
showed that the prisoner had been killed by injections. The
skull was prepared as ordered and delivered to Dr. Hoven.”
(_NO-2631, Pros. Ex. 522._)
Hoven also approved the beating of concentration camp inmates.
(_NO-2313, Pros. Ex. 523_; _NO-2312, Pros. Ex. 524._) One of these
inmates died.
On 20 August 1942, Hoven suggested to the camp commander of Buchenwald
that the reporting of deaths of Russian political prisoners be
discontinued in order to save paper. He said—
“It is requested that the question should be examined whether it
is necessary to issue reports of the death of political
Russians. According to a direction issued last week, an issue of
only one form was required. This may effect a saving of paper,
but as political Russians are for the greatest number among the
dead prisoners at the present time, more time and paper could be
saved if these death reports were dropped. Notifications of
death could be made as before, as for the Russian prisoners of
war.” (_NO-2148, Pros. Ex. 570._)
The proof has shown that beside the sixty inmates who were admittedly
killed by him, Hoven participated in the killing of many other inmates
of the Buchenwald concentration camp who suffered from malnutrition and
exhaustion. He selected the victims for the transports who were later
killed in the Bernburg Euthanasia Station. His defense that all his
activities were done only for the benefit of the political inmates in
the concentration camp is clearly ridiculous and without foundation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account