Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume II
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
A. That could be assumed to be the case with certainty. A comparison is
the manner in which all tests are carried out in this field. I shall
give you a few examples for that. When Emil von Behring in the year 1890
discovered the diphtheria serum, it was at first used by a physician of
the Berlin Charité in the case of diphtheria-infected children. He
treated about 1,200 children suffering from diphtheria with that serum.
He registered a mortality rate in the case of these children, in spite
of the treatment, of approximately 22 percent. Just as many children did
not receive the serum but were treated in a different manner. In this
group the mortality rate was double, approximately 44 percent. These 240
or 250 children who died, and who were in that control group could
certainly have been saved if they had been given the blessing of that
diphtheria serum. But that was in reality the purpose of that test and
one had to take into account that a larger ratio of fatalities would
result in the group to be compared and that then the value of the serum
would be recognized.
Q. I think that this example will suffice. In that case you are really
admitting that an objection against experiments in Buchenwald could not
be justified?
A. During the war I did not work on any disease as ardently as on
typhus. I treated thousands of patients who fell ill with typhus and
examined them. I believe that in the case of such an experience one
gains some knowledge of the disease. I often considered that question
and I hold the opinion that my objection at the time was perhaps not
justified by events. On the other hand, it is my opinion that in the
case of every task one has to keep the question in mind whether one is
in a position to execute that task. I must admit even today that in
spite of the success of the experiments, which cannot be denied, I would
act similarly in yet another position and would assume the same attitude
as I assumed at that time. Even today I would not be prepared to carry
out any such experiments personally or have them carried out upon my
responsibility, although success undoubtedly would come about.
EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANT ROSE[19]
_DIRECT EXAMINATION_
* * * * *
DR. FRITZ: What do you know about the reasons for this protest (against
experiments) being ignored and the typhus experiments being carried out
in spite of it?
* * * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account