Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIIVarious
History
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume III
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
on the block that I saw him prepare; and that then “A” hands me the
axe which I saw him sharpen and orders me to cut off the head of this
captured, bound man. Would you say that under those circumstances I
would be guilty or not guilty of killing the man whose head I severed
at the direct order of “A” who had the full power to order me to do so.
DR. JAHRREISS: I understand it this way--that guilty or not
guilty is to be considered as guilt under criminal laws.
Q. On the assumed facts, yes.
A. I just want to ask you a question. Do you mean it as a legal
question or as a question of morality?
Q. As a question of law.
A. Of law, yes. And according to what criminal law, and in what state?
Q. You can name the state; I don’t care.
A. Well, is that supposed to be a question in Utopia?
Q. Let’s put it in Germany.
A. In Germany?
Q. In Germany, yes, after 1933.
A. Yes, all right. Here then, we would be faced with terrible problems
with which all of us since last year have been torturing ourselves so
terribly, and I confess that in spite of having thought about it a
great deal, that I have not yet found my way out of the dilemma into
which we have been brought. Perhaps I can answer this hypothetical
question by saying, by stating first, the points of view which in
a conflicting manner make the answer more difficult. Perhaps first
of all I should say, so that this should be clear, Mr. Prosecutor,
how I, myself would behave.--I don’t know. No matter how horrible
the whole thing is, I don’t believe that I--well, the Charter of the
International Military Tribunal anticipates that an appeal to higher
orders should not be admissible. It is not my task to criticize those
regulations. However, perhaps I may be allowed to say that this
regulation, if it should really be valid law in any state whatsoever,
would have very dangerous consequences for order in general. One of
the four judges of the IMT, the French judge, Donnedieu De Vabres,
in a lecture which he gave this last April expressly stated that
this regulation brings with it many difficulties for the idea of the
discipline imposed by the state. I have the text of his lecture here.
It is a lecture which Professor Donnedieu De Vabres gave before the
Association des Etudes Internationales Criminologiques. May I quote a
short passage from it? May I read it in French?
THE INTERPRETER: Yes, you may.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account