Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume III — John Shaqi
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIIVarious
History
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume III
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
Indictment filed 4 January 1947
Arraignment 17 February 1947
Prosecution opening statement 5 March 1947
Defense opening statements 23 June 1947
Prosecution closing statement 13–14 October 1947
Defense closing statements 14–18 October 1947
Prosecution rebuttal closing 18 October 1947
Final statements of defendants 18 October 1947
Judgment 3–4 December 1947
Sentences 4 December 1947
Affirmation of sentences by the Military
Governor of the United States Zone of
Occupation 18 January 1949
Order of the Supreme Court of the United
States denying Writs of Habeas Corpus. 2 May 1949
The English transcript of the Court proceedings, including the
judgment, the separate opinion of Judge Blair, and the sentences, runs
to 10,964 mimeographed pages. The prosecution introduced into evidence
641 written exhibits (some of which contained several documents),
and the defense 1,452 written exhibits. The exhibits offered by
the prosecution and the defense contained documents, photographs,
affidavits, interrogatories, letters, charts, and other written
evidence. Approximately 600 of these written exhibits were affidavits,
more than 500 of which were introduced by the defense. The Tribunal and
the members thereof sitting as commissioners heard the testimony of
approximately 140 witnesses, including that of twelve of the defendants
who elected to testify. Each of the defendants who testified was
subject to examination on behalf of the other defendants. Many of the
witnesses heard by the Tribunal itself, and all of the witnesses whose
testimony was taken in the commission, were prosecution affiants who
were called for cross-examination by the defense.
The case-in-chief of the prosecution began on 5 March 1947 and ended
on 5 June 1947, subject to the understanding that several prosecution
affiants requested for cross-examination by the defense and not
immediately available for cross-examination, could be cross-examined by
the defense during the defense case. The Tribunal was in recess between
28 May 1947 and 23 June 1947, during which period the commissioners of
the Tribunals held hearings on three successive days. The defense case
began on 23 June 1947 and ended on 26 September 1947. The Tribunal was
in recess between 26 September 1947 and 13 October 1947, to give both
the prosecution and the defense additional time to prepare the closing
statements.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account