Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIIVarious
History
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume III
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
This agreement, it will be noted, expanded the initial ideas of Engert
and Thierack far beyond any more hastening of minor political court
cases or exploitation of prison labor. The agreement introduced the
ideas of exterminating the so-called “asocials,” i.e., persons who for
either racial, political, or personality reasons were deemed unfit
to live. Within a month after this agreement had been worked out and
put into practice, it was expanded further to include not only those
“asocial” elements who had finished their prison sentences, but also
all Jews, gypsies, Russians, and Ukrainians who were detained under
arrest or imprisonment in any Reich penitentiary or work house, as well
as all Poles who were sentenced to more than 3 years.
Now, since the intentional design was to literally work these people to
death once they were transferred to concentration camps, this expanded
illegal agreement actually rendered any court sentence for any crime
tantamount to a death sentence.
In some cases the death awaiting these unfortunates was not long
in coming. For example, a situation report in 1942 from the
Attorney General of the Court of Appeals in Berlin to the defendant
Schlegelberger, while the latter was Acting Minister of Justice,
revealed the following episode:
“In this connection I think I ought to point out that only
recently perpetrators have been repeatedly handed over to the
Gestapo. Also, there was no sufficient cause therefore, to be
found in my opinion, in the conduct of the justice authorities.
I am referring to criminal procedures against Skibbe and others
* * *.”
Then follows the citation of the case in the German files:
“ * * * in which 4 defendants--26, 22, 20, and 18 years of age,
respectively--accused of committing 23, 19, 15, and 12 completed
or attempted robberies, respectively, by taking advantage of
air raid protection measures, were sentenced by the Special
Court of Berlin to 7, 6, and 5½ years of penal servitude and
loss of civil rights for 10 years’ each. Although 3 of the
perpetrators had not been convicted previously and the fourth
one only of 2 comparatively minor crimes, in addition to all
of them still being comparatively young and, at least in my
opinion, the pronounced penalties being not inadequate, these
perpetrators were handed over to the Gestapo. They were shot, as
could be seen from the newspaper reports ‘because they offered
resistance.’ May I remark that it is hardly unknown to the
public any longer that these shootings ‘because of resistance
offered’ are actually caused by other considerations.”
Still operating completely beyond any existing law, decree or
regulation, this same cabal of justice officials, SS and Gestapo
extended this policy of extermination through the Occupied Eastern
Territories. As the SS and SD offices throughout those eastern
countries were instructed in November 1942--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account