On the other hand, a Turkey in subjection would be an unwilling
producer and a poor customer. The occupation of Turkey by German armed
forces would seriously deplete the ranks of the German armies on the
Russian and French frontiers, and in time of war would confront the
German General Staff with the additional problem of maintaining order
in hostile Mohammedan territory. The conquering of Turkey would bring
the German Empire into the ranks of European powers with Mohammedan
subjects, thus exposing it to the menace, common to Great Britain,
France, and Russia, of a Pan-Islamic revival. For all of these reasons
the obvious German policy was not only to respect the territorial
integrity of Turkey, but to defend it against the encroachments of
other powers. “Not a penny for a weak Turkey,” said Rohrbach, “but for
a strong Turkey everything we can give!”[12]
In its political aspects the Bagdad Railway was something more than
a railway. It was one phase of the great diplomatic struggle for
the predominance of power, one pawn in the great game between the
Alliance and the Entente, one element of the Anglo-German rivalry on
the seas. The development of closer relations, political and economic,
between Germany and Turkey was in accord with the spirit of an era of
universal preparedness—preparedness for pressing economic competition,
preparedness for the expected great European war in which every nation
would be obliged to fight for its very existence. Through control of
the economic resources of the Ottoman Empire, German diplomacy sought
to arrive at an _entente cordiale_ or a formal military alliance with
the Sultan. Through support of the chief Mohammedan power Germany
might throw tempting “apples of discord” into the colonial empires of
her chief European rivals, for Great Britain ruled about eighty-five
million subject Mohammedans, Russia about seventeen million, France
about fifteen million; but Germany possessed almost none.[13] Friedrich
Naumann wrote in 1889, in connection with the Kaiser’s pilgrimage
to the Near East: “It is possible that the world war will break out
before the disintegration of the Ottoman Empire. Then the Caliph of
Constantinople will once more uplift the standard of the Holy War.
The Sick Man will raise himself for the last time to shout to Egypt,
the Soudan, East Africa, Persia, Afghanistan, and India, ‘War against
England.’ It is not unimportant to know who will support him on his bed
when he utters this cry.”[14]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account