The Young Turk Government likewise was desirous of doing everything
possible to remove French and British objections to the construction of
railways in the Ottoman Empire. With this end in view they prevailed
upon Dr. von Gwinner to reopen negotiations with Sir Ernest Cassel
regarding British participation in the Bagdad Railway, and they secured
the consent of the _Deutsche Bank_ to a rearrangement of the terms of
the concession of 1903. The latter was to be undertaken in accordance
with British wishes and with due regard to the financial situation of
Turkey. This was followed up, on November 8, 1909, by a formal request
of the Ottoman ambassador at London for a statement of the terms upon
which the British Government would withdraw its diplomatic objections
to the Bagdad enterprise. Simultaneously negotiations were initiated
for “compensations” to French interests, represented by the Imperial
Ottoman Bank.
Until the end of the year 1909, then, the political situation in the
Ottoman Empire under the revolutionary government had been almost
altogether to the advantage of the Entente Powers. During 1910,
however, German prestige began to revive in the Near East, and by the
spring of 1911 German influence in Turkey had won back its former
preëminent position.
THE GERMANS ACHIEVE A DIPLOMATIC TRIUMPH
The Young Turk program, in its political aspects, was not only
liberal, but nationalist. In the fresh enthusiasm of the early months
of the revolution, emphasis was laid upon modernizing the political
institutions of the empire—parliamentary government and ministerial
responsibility and equality before the law were the concern of the
reformers. As time went on, however, liberalism was eclipsed by
nationalism and modernizing by Ottomanizing. By the autumn of 1909
Turkish nationalist activities were in full swing. Revolts in Macedonia
and Armenia were suppressed with an iron hand; there were massacres in
Adana and elsewhere in Anatolia and Cilicia; restrictions were imposed
upon personal liberties and upon freedom of the press; martial law
was declared. Pan-Turkism and Pan-Islamism were revived as political
movements.[6]
The development of an aggressive Turkish nationalism was not viewed
with equanimity by the Entente nations. The newspapers of France and
England roundly denounced the Adana massacres and came to adopt a
hostile attitude toward the Young Turk Revolution, which only a short
time previously they had extravagantly praised. Great Britain looked
with apprehension upon Ottoman support of the nationalist movements
in Egypt and India, and France was disturbed at the prospect of a
Pan-Islamic revival in Tunis, Algeria, and Morocco. Russia demanded
“reform” in Macedonia and Armenia and encouraged anti-Turk propaganda
in the Balkans. English interference in Cretan affairs and British
support of the insolent Sheik of Koweit still further complicated the
situation.[7]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account