There was some harsh criticism in Great Britain, however, of the
advantages which France had obtained for herself in the Ottoman Empire.
Sir Mark Sykes, an eminent student of Near Eastern affairs, believed
that the new state of affairs was worse than the old. Speaking in the
House of Commons, March 18, 1914, he warned the Foreign Office that
“the policy of French financiers will produce eventually the collapse
of the Ottoman Empire.... Take the proposed loan arranged with the
French Government, for something over £20,000,000. In order to get this
there are concessions which I cannot help feeling are more brazen and
more fatal than any I have seen. The existing railways in Syria meander
for miles to avoid legitimate profits in order to extort a guarantee.
Alongside these railways you can see the merchants’ merchandise and the
peasants’ produce rotting because the railway people do not trouble to
warehouse the stuff or to shift it. They have got their guarantee, and
they do not care. These concessions, which have been extracted from
Turkey, mean a monopoly of all Syrian transit; and, further, a native
press is to be subventioned practically in the interest of these
particular monopolies.... In practice, loans, kilometric guarantees,
monopolies, and a financed native press must, whether the financiers
desire it or not, pave the way to annexation. I submit that this is not
the spirit of the _entente_. The British people did not stand by the
French people at Agadir to fill the pockets of financiers whose names
are unknown outside Constantinople or the Paris Bourse.... The Ottoman
Empire is shaken, and the cosmopolitan financier is now staking out the
land into spheres of interest. An empire may survive disaster, but it
cannot survive exploitation. A country like Turkey, without legislative
capacity, without understanding what the economics of Europe mean and
at the same time rich, is a lamb for the slaughter.”[19]
This trenchant criticism of French policy might have been taken more
seriously had Great Britain herself been actuated by magnanimous
impulses. Instead, British financiers were joining the common scramble
for concessions, and British statesmen were pursuing with ruthless
avidity every means of protecting British imperial interests.
THE YOUNG TURKS CONCILIATE GREAT BRITAIN
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account