German statesmen and economists were by no means backward in
understanding the situation. Although they had no disposition to
overlook the development of the merchant marine and the navy, they
believed this was not enough. They sought to build up in Central Europe
a system of economic alliances, as they previously had effected a
formidable military alliance. Thus might Germany and her allies become
an economically self-sufficient unit, freed from dependence upon
British sea power.[37] And into this alliance could be incorporated
the Near East!
Beyond the Bosporus lay a country rich in oils and metals; a country
capable of supplying German textile mills with cotton of superior
quality; a country which in ancient times was fabulously wealthy in
agricultural products; a country which gave promise of developing
into a rich market for western commodities. Communication with this
wonderland was to be established by a German-controlled railway upon
which service could be maintained in time of war, as in time of
peace, without the aid of naval power. What greater inducements could
have been offered to German imperialists, living in an imperialist
world? Turkey was destined to fall within the economic orbit of an
industrialized Germany!
A distinguished German publicist said in 1903, “From the German
point of view, it would be unparalleled stupidity if we did not most
energetically do our part to acquire a share in the revival of the
ancient civilization of Mesopotamia, Syria, and Babylonia. What we do
not do others will surely do—be they British, French, or Russian; and
the increased economic advantage which, through the Bagdad Railway,
will accrue to us in the Nearer East would otherwise not only fail to
be ours, but would serve to strengthen our rivals in diplomacy and
business.”[38] Some years later, in the midst of the Great War, an
American writer expressed much the same point of view: “Hemmed in on
the west by Great Britain and France and on the east by Russia, born
too late to extend their political sovereignty over vast colonial
domains, and unable (if only for lack of coaling stations) to develop
sea power greater than that of their rivals, nothing was more natural
than the German and Austro-Hungarian conception of a _Drang nach Osten_
through the Balkan Peninsula, over the bridge of Constantinople, into
the markets of Asia. The geographical position of the Central European
states made as inevitable a penetration policy into the Balkans and
Turkey as the geographical position of England made inevitable the
development of an overseas empire.”[39] Karl Helfferich has said that
“it was neither accident nor deliberate purpose, as much as it was the
course of German economic development, which led Germany to take an
active interest in Turkey.”[40]
BIBLIOGRAPHICAL AND EXPLANATORY NOTES
[1] _The Annual Register_, 1888, pp. 44, 310.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account