1900 102,920,000 29,800,000 29,720,000 53,440,000
1901 128,220,000 37,880,000 43,800,000 57,100,000
1902 123,980,000 37,200,000 40,400,000 61,380,000
1903 114,020,000 36,640,000 45,360,000 65,120,000
1904 151,960,000 40,880,000 53,280,000 77,600,000
1905 139,300,000 42,420,000 57,200,000 76,660,000
1906 167,040,000 47,300,000 70,900,000 92,620,000
1907 147,380,000 46,380,000 63,040,000 89,920,000
1908 145,260,000 51,600,000 58,700,000 69,240,000
1909 156,280,000 54,600,000 67,740,000 77,040,000
1910 177,160,000 58,400,000 94,000,000 107,300,000
Certain important conclusions may be drawn from these statistics:
1. British trade continued during the decade 1900–1910 to dominate
the Near Eastern market. With total imports and exports in the latter
year of over 277,000,000 marks it was in no immediate danger of being
outstripped by its nearest rivals—a German trade of about 172,000,000
marks and an Austro-Hungarian trade of about 150,000,000 marks.
2. France, whose Near Eastern trade in 1900 had proudly held a
position second only to that of the United Kingdom, was being obliged
to accept a less prominent place in the economic life of the Ottoman
Empire. During the first ten years of the new century French merchants
obviously were being outmaneuvered by Germans, Austro-Hungarians, and
Italians. In spite of a total increase of 17% in exports and imports
between France and Turkey it was apparent that French trade was not
keeping the pace; during the same period Austro-Hungarian trade showed
an increased valuation of 81%, German trade of 166%.
3. Although it continued to dominate the Near Eastern market, British
commerce, likewise, was losing ground. Between 1900 and 1910 it showed
an increase of only 25% as compared with the Italian record of 172%
during the same period. During the decade British exports, although
showing an increased valuation, fell off from 35% to 22–1/2% of the
total import trade of Turkey; for the same period German exports
achieved not only an absolute gain of almost eighty million marks, but
also a relative increase from 2–1/2% to 11–1/2% of the whole.
4. The advance of German trade was not equal to the advance of Italian
trade in the Ottoman Empire during the same period. This explains, in
part, the rapidly increasing political interest of Italy in the Near
East and seems to set at rest the notion that the Germans acquired a
stranglehold on exports and imports from and to Turkey.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account