Detective and mystery stories; Murder -- Fiction; Science fiction
Q: It isn't possible you've forgotten some additional remark? Think
carefully, please.
A: No, sir. That's all I said. I swear it.
Q: Very well. Now how well do you know Miss Dakin?
A: Just to speak to.
Q: Have you ever seen her outside Professor Gilmore's office?
A: No, sir.
Q: Ever ask her for a date?
A: No, sir.
Q: Did you ever have an argument with her? A discussion of any kind
that may have become a bit heated?
A: No, sir.
Q: Then to your knowledge she'd have no reason to dislike you?
A: No, sir.
Q: Very good. Now, Mr. Cordell, I want to read to you an excerpt
from the testimony given by Miss Dakin in this court. "Mr. Cordell
was looking very angry when he came in. He came up to me and bent
down over the desk and said so low I could hardly hear him: 'Hi,
Alma. You think the Prof's through making love to my wife?'" I now
ask you, Paul Cordell, isn't that what you said to Alma Dakin? Not
that she was working too hard, or whatever it was you claimed to
have said.
A: No, sir. I didn't say anything like she said I did. I wouldn't
insult my wife by saying such a thing to a third--
Q: Just answer the questions, Mr. Cordell. Then you contend that
Miss Dakin deliberately lied in her testimony.
A: She was mistaken.
Q: Oh, come now! Miss Dakin is an intelligent girl; she couldn't
misunderstand or twist your words to that extent. Now could she?
A: Then she lied. I never said anything like that.
Q: What reason would she have for lying, Mr. Cordell? By your own
statement she hardly knew you, always greeted you pleasantly on the
times you came to the office, never got into any arguments with
you, and never saw you outside the office. She had worked for
Professor Gilmore for five or six months, has excellent references,
and is well liked by her friends. Yet you're asking us to believe
that she coldly and deliberately lied to get you into trouble. Is
that true?
A: All I know is she lied.
* * * * *
The break was there all right, Kirk thought grimly. For if Cordell was
innocent, then he had told the truth during the trial. And if he had
told the truth about his remark to Alma Dakin, then, automatically, Alma
Dakin's testimony was untrue.
Kirk ran his fingers through his hair in a gesture of bafflement. What
possible reason could Gilmore's secretary have for going out of her way
to lie about Cordell's remark? Was it because she was so certain he had
killed her employer that she wanted to make sure he would be punished?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account