Twenty Centuries of ParisSmith, Mabell S. C. (Mabell Shippie Clarke)
History
Twenty Centuries of Paris
Smith, Mabell S. C. (Mabell Shippie Clarke)
Paris (France) -- History
The years intervening between the growth of Philip’s determination and
his chance to put it into effect were filled with work which developed
the young king’s naturally strong character and intelligence. After
Henry’s death one of his troublesome sons succeeded him--Richard, who
has come down in history as “the Lion-hearted.” Richard was handsome and
brave, a man to stir the imagination and admiration of a fighting age,
but he was too impetuous and too active to apply himself to the study of
government. When the call came for the Third Crusade Richard found in it
an outlet for his energy for which he would not have to make excuse to
his deserted kingdom. He and Philip and Frederick of Germany all went to
the East, and there the French and English kings came to know each
other, Philip envying Richard’s dash and audacity and envied in turn for
the statesmanlike qualities which he was developing.
When it became evident that his presence would be of no help to a
crusade doomed to failure Philip insisted on withdrawing to France where
he knew that his coming would be of advantage; Richard stayed on with no
thought for his kingdom, hoping for further adventure. Philip put
himself in touch with conditions in and around the Île de France, took
advantage of all disturbances in his vassal’s provinces which would give
him even a slender foothold, and was ready to meet any act of Richard’s
successor, John, whatever it might be.
The opportunity came soon after John’s accession, for he could be
depended upon to open some loophole through his disposition toward
devious ways rather than straightforward. As lord of the western
provinces of France he was Philip’s vassal; as Duke of Brittany his boy
nephew, Arthur, was his vassal. When war broke out between France and
England and John went across the Channel to pursue it, he found that his
nephew, incited by Philip, without doubt, was laying claim to other
provinces than Brittany. The easiest way out of the difficulty was to
murder Arthur, which John is said to have done either with his own hand
or by the dirks of ruffians in his presence. After Philip had stormed a
fortress that had been looked upon as the chief defender of Rouen the
frightened Englishman fled home, and then Philip devised a plan of
making Arthur’s death work to his advantage. As John’s suzerain he
summoned him to Paris to answer for his nephew’s death before the king’s
court. John refused to appear unless he were promised a safe-conduct
not only to the city but home again. Philip refused to promise
protection for the return trip unless the court should declare John not
guilty of the charge against him. Philip hardly could have expected that
John would thrust his head into the noose, but it suited his purpose
quite as well that he should not. What he wanted was his land and that
he could take now with perfect justice when the court declared John
guilty of murder and of treason in disobeying the orders of his
overlord.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account