Twenty-five years of the Philadelphia Orchestra, 1900-1925Wister, Frances Anne
History
Twenty-five years of the Philadelphia Orchestra, 1900-1925
Wister, Frances Anne
Philadelphia Orchestra
“Strauss has a very precise beat, ordinarily quiet
and undemonstrative and making very little use of his
left hand; but when he wants a big climax for the
brasses—and he is not afraid of noise—he conducts
with his whole person. The orchestra knew the music
perfectly and was absolutely responsive to every nuance.”
_City and State_, March 10th, 1904:
“The highest point, not only of the winter, but in
a certain sense of all previous musical seasons was
reached last week.
“To have the most eminent musician—we use the
word advisedly in the strictest sense—interpret
his compositions with our own orchestra in two
concerts, certainly marks Philadelphia as one of the
self-dependent musical centers of the world. But it
was much more significant to hear the unstinted praise
which Mr. Strauss bestowed on the orchestra after the
concerts. On Friday, after the exalting performance
of “Death and Transfiguration,” the composer seemed
to forget his audience in the heartiness of his
acknowledgments to the orchestra. Indeed, we see no
impropriety whatever in publishing the fact that Mr.
Strauss was immeasurably better pleased with the
work of our orchestra than with that of the New York
orchestra, which he conducted last Thursday evening.
On Tuesday he declared himself entirely contented
with the single rehearsal for the Friday concert. It
seems almost a pity that we Philadelphians cannot
discover for ourselves this excellence of our own
enterprise—that we must have the most distinguished
musician of the day come from Berlin to tell us that
we have a splendid orchestra, and, it may be added,
splendid conductor. At any rate, the fact ought not
only to be taken to heart by all of us, but we ought
not to hesitate to boast bravely of this advantage of
ours over New York.”
These concerts were repeated in Boston on March 7th and 8th, where
they had been well advertised and both houses sold out. But when the
programmes were announced there was a cry of protest from the critics
and musicians of that city. “Why should Boston have to listen to
Fritz Scheel conduct a symphony on each programme?” The Executive
Committee replied firmly that Boston had refused to have Dr. Strauss
lead the Boston Symphony Orchestra, and now the Philadelphia Orchestra
Association was giving Boston an opportunity to hear Dr. Strauss
conduct as guest conductor of the Philadelphia Orchestra. The programme
was not changed, but Philadelphia had to explain the stand she had
taken even after the orchestra had reached Boston.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account