Two Centuries of Shipbuilding by the Scotts at GreenockScotts' Shipbuilding & Engineering Co. Ltd.
History
Two Centuries of Shipbuilding by the Scotts at Greenock
Scotts' Shipbuilding & Engineering Co. Ltd.
Scotts' Shipbuilding & Engineering Co. Ltd.; Shipbuilding -- Great Britain
-----+------------------+--------+---------+-------+------------------
[A] It is difficult to determine in all cases the basis on which
horse-power was computed. The figures given represent nominal
horse-power, and in Sennett and Oram's "Marine Steam Engine" (page 3),
the indicated horse-power is, for this early period, recorded as 1.8
times the nominal horse-power.
We enter now upon the period when iron took the place of timber as a
constructional material. It was first used in part in the construction,
on the banks of the Monkland Canal as far back as 1818, of a canal
barge named the _Vulcan_, a vessel which continued at work for over
sixty years.[41] But the first vessel built entirely of iron was a
small craft constructed in 1821 in England. It was not, however, until
1832 that the first sea-going vessel was built of this metal. Progress
in the adoption of iron was slow, largely because timber had proved so
serviceable, and, with lessened restriction upon its importation, had
become much cheaper. It was not until the higher strength and greater
ductility of steel were demonstrated in the 'eighties that timber
was finally superseded. The last wooden ship built by the Scotts was
completed in 1859.
The firm built several of the early Atlantic liners, and we reproduce
on page 32, as a further step in the development of the steam engine,
a drawing showing the double-gear engines constructed early in the
'fifties for an iron screw steamer of 1190 tons, built for the Glasgow
and New York service. This engine was pronounced at the time "the most
compact specimen of its type then in existence,"[42] for although
the power developed was 250 horse-power, and the ship was 260 ft. in
length, only 12 ft. 6 in. of the fore-and-aft length was taken up by
the machinery. "Every weight was well balanced, the working parts
were clear and open, and the combined whole was stable, firm, and
well bound together." The cylinders were 52 in. in diameter, were
arranged diagonally, and worked at right angles to each other, with
a stroke of 3 ft. 9 in. The piston-rods projected through the lower
covers, to allow of long return connecting-rods. Each cylinder had two
piston-rods, for greater steadiness, their outer ends in each case
being keyed into a crosshead, fitted at each end with slide-blocks,
working in a pair of inclined open guide-frames, bolted to the bottom
cylinder cover, and supported beneath by projecting bracket-pieces,
recessed and bolted down upon pedestal pieces on the engine sole-plate.
From each end of this crosshead, immediately outside the guide-frame,
a plain straight connecting-rod of round section passed up to actuate
the main first-motion shaft. The upper ends of the connecting-rods were
jointed to side-studs, or crank-pins, fixed in two opposite arms of
a pair of large spur-wheels, which gave motion to the screw-shaft by
means of a pair of corresponding spur-pinions, fixed on the shaft.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account