Two English queens and PhilipHume, Martin A. S. (Martin Andrew Sharp)
Philosophy
Two English queens and Philip
Hume, Martin A. S. (Martin Andrew Sharp)
Whilst Ballard waited in Paris the reply of Mendoza, the latter received
important letters from Mary Stuart, who at last had been able, by
Morgan’s contrivance, to reopen correspondence with the outer world,
little dreaming, poor soul, that the facilities provided were only a trap
of her enemies. This was the first time she had communicated with Mendoza
since his arrival in Paris a year before, and William Paget, the brother
of Charles, was her messenger. He was to make certain proposals to him
for Philip’s aid to “our designs”; but by far the most important part of
the message came afterwards. The continued heresy of her son James had,
she said, well-nigh broken her heart, and in order to secure the triumph
of the Church “I will cede and make over by will to the King your master
my right to the succession of the English Crown, and ask him to take me
in future entirely under his protection, and also the affairs of this
country. For the discharge of my own conscience I could not hope to place
them in the hands of a Prince more zealous in our Catholic faith or more
capable in all respects of re-establishing it in this country.... I am
obliged in this matter to prefer the public welfare of the Church to the
aggrandisement of my posterity.”
Thus Mary finally embraced the Jesuit view which looked forward to
a Spanish sovereignty over England to the detriment of her son and
Scotland, and in opposition to many of her friends and adherents in
England and France.[270] To the King of Spain this renunciation of her
son by Mary was of profound significance. His own English descent had
never been lost sight of, but here his claim was rendered legitimate
apart from his ancestry; and Mendoza, though when he received Mary’s
letter he had just been couched for cataract and was temporarily blind,
caused a reply to be written to the Queen warmly commending her saintly
resolution. She saw, he said, how evil her son was disposed, and the
French had done little enough for her, whereas Philip had always
befriended her. “Moreover,” he wrote to Philip, “failing the Queen of
Scots and her son, your Majesty is the direct legitimate heir to the
Crown of England. Cecil, the Lord Treasurer, was in the habit of saying
that the Duchy of Lancaster had been unlawfully usurped from your
Majesty.”[271] No wonder that Philip replied to this in what was for him
an unusually effusive strain: “She [Mary Stuart] has greatly risen in my
estimation in consequence of what she says, and has much increased the
devotion I have always felt for her interests, not so much because of
what she says in my favour, though I am very grateful for that also, as
because she postpones her love for her son, which might be expected to
lead her astray, for the service of our Lord, the good of Christendom,
and the salvation of England. Tell her all this from me, and assure her
that if she perseveres in the good path she has chosen I hope that God
will bless her by placing her in possession of her own.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account