Two English queens and PhilipHume, Martin A. S. (Martin Andrew Sharp)
Philosophy
Two English queens and Philip
Hume, Martin A. S. (Martin Andrew Sharp)
Noailles partly suspected what to us now is clear, namely, that all this
suavity and tolerance on the part of the Prince of the proudest nation
on earth was only a part of the deep-laid plan of the Emperor to obtain
for his son the full control of English policy that the marriage treaty
had withheld from him. Mary probably suspected this as little as any one.
Her position was extremely difficult. She was by this time really in
love with her husband, and was deeply desirous of pleasing him; she was
anxious for the aggrandisement of Spain, which would mean, she thought,
the triumph of the Church over heresy in Europe, and the consolidation
of her own throne. But she knew that her people dreaded above all things
being dragged into a war with their nearest neighbour in a quarrel which
did not concern them: she was an English Queen determined, so far as
in her lay, to govern for the benefit of her country, and to her the
only road to safety seemed to strive her hardest to bring about a peace
between the two antagonists before England was involved in the war. Pole
had also been entrusted by the Pope with the mission of pacifying the
Emperor and Henry II., and was as earnest in his efforts to do so as was
Mary herself. From Brussels, where he had been kept chafing impotently,
he had gone to Paris on his mission of peace, but the French arms were
on the whole in the ascendant at the time, and he returned to Flanders
unsuccessful.[68]
These efforts of Mary, Pole, and Gardiner, to reconcile France and Spain,
received no active help from Philip and his father. The object of the
Emperor was to cripple France by the aid of England, not to patch up
another temporary peace with her, and the whole tendency of the Imperial
policy was to obtain complete control over England as the first step
to this principal object. The Emperor had always used religion when
necessary as an instrument for political ends, and it is not surprising
that the English Catholic Churchmen should regard his present attitude
towards the Catholic party as inconsistent. Gardiner, Pole, Bonner, and
the rest of them, who had never yearned for the Spanish connection,
thought, perhaps correctly, that they could have restored England to
the Church more speedily and safely if they had been unencumbered by
the unpopular marriage. Mary, for whom the question was complicated by
considerations of her personal maintenance upon the throne, thought
otherwise, and wisely the Churchmen had made the best of the position.
But they had no intention, if they could help it, of slackening in their
own purpose, or of allowing the restoration of their faith in England to
be retarded or imperilled for the political interests of the Emperor; and
the harsh action of Bonner particularly, supported as it was by Gardiner,
caused bitter complaints amongst the English people, and something
approaching dismay in the Spanish party of Mary’s Council.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account