22. See Daniel A. Fineman, “The Case of the Lady ‘Killed’ by Alexander Pope,” _MLO_, XII (1951), 137-149. Sutherland in his continuation of Pope’s note confuses the two charges. 23. For the debate over the Latin inscription see _Twickenham_, VI. 395-396, and _The Gentleman’s Magazine_, XI, 105. 24. See Pope’s note to l. 319 of the _Epistle to Arbuthnot_. 25. Dennis, as far back as 1716, in _A True Character of Mr. Pope_, pp. 10-11, had used the metaphor. So had _An Epistle To the Egregious Mr. Pope_ (1734), pp. 15-16. * * * * * * * * * [Transcriber’s Note: The consecutive title pages are as in the original, as are the lines of closely spaced asterisks in the poem. Format of notes reproduces the original as closely as possible. Long notes, marked with lower-case letters (a-l), were collected at the end of the text. Footnotes are here shown between stanzas. Markers are unchanged, except where a symbol has been doubled (**, ††) because it occurs twice in one stanza.] ONE E P I S T L E TO Mr. _A. P O P E_, Occasion’d By Two Lately Publish’d. [To be Continued.] ONE E P I S T L E TO Mr. _A. P O P E_, Occasion’d By Two Epistles Lately Published. _Spiteful he is not, tho’ he writ a Satire, For still there goes some Thinking to Ill-Nature._ DRYDEN. _L O N D O N_: Printed for J. ROBERTS, in _Warwick-Lane_. [Price One Shilling.] [Decoration] THE PREFACE. _The indecent Images, and the frequent and bad Imitations of the Classics in the _Dunciad_, have occasioned several just Observations upon so new and coarse a Manner of Writing: I shall wave this Topic at present, and only regard the most plausible Insinuation in Favour of this Author; which is, that he never begun an Attack upon any Person, who had not before, either in Print or private Conversation, endeavour’d something to his Disadvantage._