Two Years on Trek: Being Some Account of the Royal Sussex Regiment in South AfricaDu Moulin, Louis Eugène
History
Two Years on Trek: Being Some Account of the Royal Sussex Regiment in South Africa
Du Moulin, Louis Eugène
Great Britain. Army. Royal Sussex Regiment; South African War, 1899-1902 -- Regimental histories -- Great Britain
The farms are all fenced with barbed wire, of generally three strands,
with posts of wood or, more usually, of big slabs of quarried stone.
These wire fences were of course a great hindrance to all mounted men
and had to be cut in all directions.
On the march we used to move in column of fours, unless the veldt was
broad and open, when we still kept our fours but moved the companies
out to the right and left, so that we were really in a column of double
companies moving in fours to a flank. This was a very good and simple
formation, since the companies could open out or close in to the centre
without difficulty, and at any time they were all handy and ready to
move in any direction without the slightest delay. The battalion seldom
or never moved in column of companies, as it was found that this was the
most tiring formation of all in a long march, especially when the men
were carrying a full kit. This full kit consisted of rifle, with
magazine charged; haversack, with one day's complete rations and one
day's issue of tea, sugar and biscuit; canteen and water-bottle;
sidearms and equipment with 100 rounds of ammunition; and a blanket,
strapped on the waistbelt at the back. All this totals up a good load,
but there was nothing that could have been dispensed with, the blanket,
which was most cumbersome and unwieldy, being really as necessary as
anything.
The officers wore equipment the same as the men, and nearly all of them
carried a rifle or a carbine. This was a most necessary precaution, as
there is no doubt the enemy invariably directed their fire on the
officers, and of course anyone seen to be dressed differently to the
men, or not carrying a rifle, would be immediately spotted by the Boers.
I asked some of the prisoners this question when we were escorting them
from the Golden Gate, and they said at once that they always
concentrated their fire on those who appeared to be the leaders.
The advanced flank and rear guards were always found by the mounted
troops, who kept well away from us; as indeed they ought to, if they
intend to keep the column beyond rifle shot of the enemy, which may be
taken as fully 2,000 yards, or about a mile and a quarter. It will
easily be seen what a farce a flank guard of infantry must be, unless
it can move at such a distance from the column as will enable it
effectually to protect that column, without hampering it or checking its
progress. On the other hand, if the flank guard gets too far away from
the column, it is liable to be cut off itself, whilst if it remains too
close in, it does no good and merely masks the fire of the main body. It
is a difficult question to answer--how is a column to protect itself in
these days of long range rifle fire unless it has mounted men?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account