U.S. Marine Operations in Korea, 1950-1953, Volume 4 (of 5): The East-Central FrontMontross, Lynn
History
U.S. Marine Operations in Korea, 1950-1953, Volume 4 (of 5): The East-Central Front
Montross, Lynn
Korean War, 1950-1953 -- Campaigns; United States. Marine Corps -- History -- Korean War, 1950-1953
Although the fighting had not been severe for other units of the 1st
Marine Division during the first two weeks of July, the casualties
(including KMC losses) were 55 KIA, 360 WIA, and 22 MIA--a total of
437. Relief of the Marines was completed by the 2d Infantry Division
on 15 July, and by the 17th all units were on their way back to
assembly areas in X Corps rear.
It was the second time since the landing of the 1st Provisional Marine
Brigade on 2 August 1950 that the Marines had been away from the firing
line for more than a few days.
_Red Herrings at Kaesong_
It is not changing the subject to switch to the truce talks. Kaesong
was actually a second UN front.
After the preliminaries had been settled--most of them to Communist
satisfaction--the UN delegation, headed by Admiral Joy, held a first
meeting on 10 July 1951 with his opposite number, NKPA Major General
Nam Il, and the Communist truce team. This was the first of the talks
that were to drag on for two dreary years.
Nam Il, a Korean native of Manchuria, born in 1911, had been educated
in Russia and had served with the Soviet army in World War II. His
career in Korea began when he arrived as a captain with Soviet
occupation troops in 1945. Rising to power rapidly, he took a prominent
part in the creation of a Soviet puppet state in North Korea.
An atmosphere of sullen hatred surrounded the UN delegates at Kaesong.
The CCF sentinel posted at the entrance to the conference room wore a
gaudy medal which he boasted had been awarded to him “for killing forty
Americans.” When Admiral Joy tried to send a report to General Ridgway,
the messenger was turned back by armed Communist guards. These are
samples of the indignities heaped upon the UN truce team. After several
UN delegates were threatened by guards with burp guns, Joy protested to
Nam Il, “demanding prompt elimination of such crudities.”
In order to give their battered armies more time for recuperation, the
Communist delegates met every issue with delaying tactics. They proved
themselves to be masters of the ancient art of dragging a red herring
across the trail. Going back on their word did not embarrass them in
the least if they found it to their advantage to renege.[252]
[252] This section, except when otherwise noted, is derived
from the following sources: Joy, _How Communists
Negotiate_, 6–10, 129, 140; Carl Berger, _The Korean
Knot_ (University of Pennsylvania Press, 1957), 141–151;
Comments n.d., Col J. C. Murray.
The truce negotiations were bound to have an immediate effect on
military operations. In the United States it seemed a pity to
newspaper readers that American young men should have to die in
battle at a time when headlines were hinting at the possibility of
peace. Mothers wrote to their congressmen, requesting a halt in Korean
operations.
General Van Fleet minced no words after his retirement when he
commented on the effect of the truce talks on strategy:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account