U.S. Marine Operations in Korea, 1950-1953, Volume 4 (of 5): The East-Central FrontMontross, Lynn
History
U.S. Marine Operations in Korea, 1950-1953, Volume 4 (of 5): The East-Central Front
Montross, Lynn
Korean War, 1950-1953 -- Campaigns; United States. Marine Corps -- History -- Korean War, 1950-1953
The above quotation, from the opening paragraph of the report of the
1st Marine Division for October 1951, sums up in a nutshell the new
trend of operations since 20 September. It is significant that for
the first time in 1951 the Division Historical Diary departs from a
daily account of events and divides the month into two equal parts
for a chronicle of operations. Not enough had happened to justify a
day-by-day summary.
This does not mean that the Marines neglected any opportunity to do
the enemy hurt. It means only that the opportunities of defensive
warfare were limited as compared to the preceding six months of
offensive operations. That the Marines made the best of such
opportunities is shown by the fact that the ratio of enemy to friendly
casualties increased from the 4-to-1 of September to the 20-to-1 of
October, even though the totals of the former month were larger.[312]
[312] 1stMarDiv _HD_, Oct 51, 1–3.
As a result of his new defensive policies, the enemy often avoided
a fight. Day after day passed during the first two weeks of October
without far-ranging Marine patrols being able to make contact.
Line MINNESOTA, the new MLR (Map 20), ran roughly parallel to the
hays line but included advanced positions taken in the September
offensive. During the first 10 days of October the 2d Battalion of the
1st Marines continued to be the Division forward reserve in readiness
for a quick shift to any threatened point in the MLR, and the Division
Reconnaissance Company had the mission of maintaining daily contact
with the 11th ROK Division on the Marines’ right flank.
It might seem that the 7th Marines, 17 miles to the rear at Wontong-ni,
would be entirely becalmed. Yet this regiment saw as much action on
some days as any of the three regiments ranging forward of the MLR.
The explanation was that the rear area was infested with elusive North
Korean guerrillas who kept the 7th Marines patrols busy.
Early in October the question arose as to how quickly a reserve
battalion could be shifted from one point to another. By this time
a company-size helicopter lift had become commonplace, having been
successfully completed twice by HMR-161 since Operation SUMMIT. It
remained to be seen whether a battalion could be transported with
comparable celerity, and, on 9 October, Division issued an order
warning of 3/7’s move.
The 7th Marines was due to exchange places with the 5th Marines on
the 11th after relieving that regiment in the center of the Division
front. While 1/7 and 2/7 completed a conventional relief of their
opposite numbers, 3/7 was selected for a helicopter lift. Lieutenant
Colonel Edwards, the new commanding officer, had recently commanded the
Shore Party Battalion and helped to train its landing site and loading
point teams. He took part in the planning along with Colonel Krulak,
Lieutenant Colonels Herring and Mitchell, and the new commanding
officer of the Shore Party Battalion, Lieutenant Colonel George G.
Pafford.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account