U.S. Marine Operations in Korea, 1950-1953, Volume 4 (of 5): The East-Central FrontMontross, Lynn
History
U.S. Marine Operations in Korea, 1950-1953, Volume 4 (of 5): The East-Central Front
Montross, Lynn
Korean War, 1950-1953 -- Campaigns; United States. Marine Corps -- History -- Korean War, 1950-1953
Digging in is an understatement of the way the Korean-Chinese
troops literally burrowed into the mountains, constructed two
and three story dwellings underground, linked mountains and
hills by underground tunnels and carved deep communication
trenches linking flank with flank and front with rear. They raked
the insides out of mountains as you would rake ashes out of a
furnace. Each hill, mountain or ridge was connected with its
neighbors by deep, zig-zagged inter-communication trenches, at
least two yards below ground level and with yard-high antiblast
walls. In emergency, troops could be switched from hill-top
to hill-top with the enemy never knowing. Similar trenches
extended well to the rear, so that supplies could be brought
up and withdrawals if necessary made in comparative safety....
Everything was deep underground with many yards of rock and earth
between them and shells and bombs, atomic or otherwise. Back of
the front line positions, similar scooped-out mountain ridges
stretched all the way back to Pyongyang and further. It was
against these positions that Van Fleet began hurling his troops
in August, 1951.[360]
[360] _Ibid._ General Van Fleet did not “hurl” his troops
against anything. He began limited offensives for the
purpose of improving Eighth Army morale and maintaining
offensive spirit. See Gen James A. Van Fleet, ltr of 28
Feb 59.
The breathing spell provided by preliminary truce talk discussions gave
the Communists an opportunity they had not previously enjoyed. Not only
did they have time to prepare sturdy and effective entrenchments, but
they were able to bring up additional mortars and artillery to equal
those of the Allied forces. As a further advantage, while “free from
the compulsion of impending military disaster,”[361] they made use
of the interlude to reorganize and train NKPA divisions to a new and
increased level of effectiveness.
[361] C. Turner Joy, _How Communists Negotiate_, 28.
Communists are never embarrassed in the least to deny an agreement
already reached, and once having accomplished their intermediate goal,
the Red delegates broke off the Kaesong talks for a while. Once the
pressure on them was reduced, the enemy was in a position to try to
obtain the most favorable terms for armistice talks, even if it meant
prolonging the fighting.
The change in tactics soon became apparent. “Since the opening of the
Kaesong conference,” commented a FECom G-2 report, “the enemy has
deviated from his usual tactics of ‘flexible defense’ which he so
skilfully employed during the buildup period prior to all his past
offensives--to that of a more orthodox ‘fixed defense.’ Where the enemy
in the past has defended key terrain features with relatively small
groups to delay friendly forces, he has now changed over to tactics of
a fixed line of defense to be defended at all costs.”[362]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account