U.S. Marine Operations in Korea, 1950-1953, Volume 4 (of 5): The East-Central FrontMontross, Lynn
History
U.S. Marine Operations in Korea, 1950-1953, Volume 4 (of 5): The East-Central Front
Montross, Lynn
Korean War, 1950-1953 -- Campaigns; United States. Marine Corps -- History -- Korean War, 1950-1953
[362] FECom G-2 Intelligence Summary, 18 Sep 51.
“The most extended delay imposed upon the Korean Armistice Conference
by the Communists was in connection with the exchange of prisoners of
war,”[363] which subject will be discussed in Volume V of this series.
The United Nations contended that all prisoners should be “screened”
to determine whether they wished to return to their side of origin. No
prisoner was to be returned against his wishes. The Communists claimed
this treatment consisted of a reign of terror in which CCF prisoners
were held at gunpoint.
[363] Joy, _How Communists Negotiate_, 53.
Some prisoners held in UN camps rioted and injuries and deaths
resulted. This provided the Communists with excellent propaganda on
which to denounce our principles of no forced repatriation.[364] In
the end, after a delay of more than 14 months of war, the Communists
finally did accept this principle, and an armistice was achieved.
[364] _Ibid._
The Communist delaying tactics were not entirely without benefits
to the Allied forces, for the major part of the 1st Marine Division
had the opportunity to go into reserve and engage in several weeks’
intensive training. While the 1st Marine Aircraft Wing was busily
participating in the interdiction activities of Operation STRANGLE,
General Van Fleet and his ground commanders felt frustrated over their
orders to “sit tight” rather than attack and prevent further enemy
buildup.
An agreement to resume cease-fire talks, this time at Panmunjom, led to
a EUSAK order which committed the 1st Marine Division and other major
units to a defensive stand behind a fixed line of demarcation on 20
September 1951 (Map 19). Further negotiations resulted in a month’s
lull which was brought about by the fact that the delegates could
not agree on where the lines would remain if the fighting stopped.
The United States delegates pressed for a settlement within a 30-day
period. The Communists continued to stall. The United States then
consented to accept the present (then current) demarcation line if the
Communists agreed within the 30-day period.[365]
[365] Col J. C. Murray, Comments, Jan 59.
The significance of these dates was to become more and more plain as
the conflict dragged on into 1952 with both sides on the defensive,
limiting themselves to the raids and patrols of positional warfare
while the appointed representatives haggled for a truce. Although the
Marines did not realize it, the war had already turned into a contest
of watchful waiting and fierce local fights.
This line of demarcation left the Eighth Army holding a MLR across
one of the narrowest parts of the peninsula (Map 22). Just behind
the Communist MLR the peninsula bulged to the west. This meant that
the enemy had to devote much of his effort to mining the waters and
defense of many beaches against a surprise amphibious attack, and it
necessitated keeping in operation long and vulnerable supply lines.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account