U.S. Marine Operations in Korea, 1950-1953, Volume 4 (of 5): The East-Central FrontMontross, Lynn
History
U.S. Marine Operations in Korea, 1950-1953, Volume 4 (of 5): The East-Central Front
Montross, Lynn
Korean War, 1950-1953 -- Campaigns; United States. Marine Corps -- History -- Korean War, 1950-1953
Chinese prisoners taken during the first three weeks of April 1951 told
all they knew with no apparent reluctance, just as Japanese captives
had given information in World War II. Inconsistent as it may seem that
fanatical Asian soldiers should prove so cooperative, such was the
penalty the enemy paid for insisting on resistance to the last ditch.
Since the possibility of surrender was not considered, CCF prisoners
were taught no code of behavior and answered questions freely and
frankly.
POW interrogations were supplemented by captured documents revealing
that the Chinese prided themselves on a new tactical doctrine known
as “the roving defensive,” put into effect in the spring of 1951. It
meant “not to hold your position to the death, but to defend against
the enemy through movement,” explained a secret CCF directive dated 17
March 1951. “Therefore, the wisdom of the roving defensive is based
on exhausting the enemy without regard for the loss or gain of some
fighting area or the immediate fulfillment of our aims.”[150]
[150] This section is based upon the following documents: IX
Corps _CmdRpt_ 5, Apr 51, Sec 3, Intelligence; 1stMarDiv
_HD_, Apr 51; _PIR_ 171, 179, 180.
It was admitted that the CCF soldier must work harder, “because the
troops will have to construct entrenchments and field works in every
place they move.” But the advantages were that “roving warfare can
conserve our power, deplete the enemy’s strength, and secure for us
more favorable conditions for future victory. Meanwhile, the enemy will
make the mistake once again, and collapse on the Korean battlefield.”
The last sentence evidently refers to the UN advance of late November
1950 that was rolled back by a surprise CCF counteroffensive. Chinese
strategists seem to have concluded that their “roving defensive” had
made possible another such offensive victory in the spring of 1951. At
any rate, prisoners questioned by the 1st Marine Division and other IX
Corps units agreed that the CCF 5th Phase Offensive was scheduled to
begin on 22 April 1951. The IX Corps zone was said to be the target
area for an attempted breakthrough.[151]
[151] EUSAK, IX Corps and 1stMarDiv G-2 _PIR_s, 1–20 Apr 51.
Marine G-2 officers recalled that prisoners gave information on the eve
of the CCF offensive in November 1950 that proved to be astonishingly
accurate in the light of later events. For it was a paradox that
the Chinese Reds, so secretive in other respects, let the man in the
ranks know about high-level strategic plans. In the spring of 1951 it
mattered little, since air reconnaissance had kept the Eighth Army well
informed as to the enemy buildup.
Prisoners were taken in the IX Corps zone from the following major CCF
units during the first three weeks of April:
20th Army (58th, 59th, and 60th Divisions), estimated strength,
24,261;
26th Army (76th, 77th, and 78th Divisions), estimated total
strength, 22,222;
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account