U.S. Marine Operations in Korea, 1950-1953, Volume 4 (of 5): The East-Central FrontMontross, Lynn
History
U.S. Marine Operations in Korea, 1950-1953, Volume 4 (of 5): The East-Central Front
Montross, Lynn
Korean War, 1950-1953 -- Campaigns; United States. Marine Corps -- History -- Korean War, 1950-1953
The enemy was kept at a discreet distance throughout the night by
continuous artillery fires supplemented by ripples from Captain Eugene
A. Bushe’s Battery C, 1st 4.5´´ Rocket Battalion. An acute shortage
of trucks made it necessary for most of the troops to hike. Then came
the task of organizing the new Division defenses on a line running
northeast and southwest through the northern outskirts of Chunchon (Map
10). Planning continued meanwhile for further withdrawals to positions
astride the Hongchon-Chunchon MSR.[187]
[187] CO IX Corps _IXACT 1370_; 1stMar _HD_, Apr 51; 5thMar
_HD_, Apr 51; 7thMar _HD_, Apr 51. A “ripple” normally
consists of 144 rounds fired simultaneously by six
launchers.
It was apparent by this time that the enemy had been badly mauled on
the IX Corps front. The Communists were now making a supreme effort to
smash through in the I Corps area and capture Seoul. It was believed
that they had set themselves the goal of taking the city by May Day,
the world-wide Communist holiday.
In this aspiration they were destined to be disappointed. They tried to
work around the Eighth Army’s left flank by crossing the river Han to
the Kimpo Peninsula, but air strikes and the threat of naval gunfire
frustrated them. Another flanking attempt 35 miles to the southeast
met repulse, and before the end of the month it was evident that the
Chinese Reds would not celebrate May Day in Seoul.
Generally speaking, the Eighth Army had kept its major units intact
and inflicted frightful losses on the enemy while trading shell-pocked
ground for Chinese lives. The night of 27–28 April saw little activity
on the IX Corps front, adding to the evidence that the enemy had shot
his bolt. The next day the 1st Marine Division, along with other
Eighth Army forces, continued the withdrawal to the general defensive
line designated NO NAME Line (Map 10). Further withdrawals were not
contemplated, asserted the IX Corps commander, who sent this message to
General Thomas:
It is the intention of CG Eighth Army to hold firmly on general
defense line as outlined in my Operation Plan 17 and my message
9639, and from this line to inflict maximum personnel casualties
by an active defense utilizing artillery and sharp armored
counterattacks. Withdrawal south of this line will be initiated
only on personal direction of Corps commander.[188]
[188] CG IX Corps msg to CG 1stMarDiv with plans for
withdrawal, 28 Apr 51.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account