U.S. Marine Operations in Korea, 1950-1953, Volume 5 (of 5): Operations in West KoreaUnited States. Marine Corps
History
U.S. Marine Operations in Korea, 1950-1953, Volume 5 (of 5): Operations in West Korea
United States. Marine Corps
Korean War, 1950-1953 -- Campaigns; United States. Marine Corps -- History -- Korean War, 1950-1953
Some had labeled Eisenhower’s statement, “I will go to Korea” as a mere
pre-election gesture. The general intended to act on this pledge and,
following his election, began a four-day visit to Korea on 2 December
1952. Part of the President-elect’s brief tour in Korea was spent
at General Pollock’s command post. Here, on 3 December, the Marine
ground chief briefed his future Commander in Chief on current Marine
division operations. Generals Clark, Van Fleet, and Kendall accompanied
Eisenhower and his party. This included General of the Army Omar
Bradley, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, as well as Charles E.
Wilson and Herbert Brownell, Jr., the new designates for Secretary of
Defense and Attorney General, respectively.
Though General Eisenhower’s promise to visit Korea personally to see
the situation first-hand and his subsequent election had renewed
American hopes for an early peace in Korea, negotiations there had been
deadlocked since 1951 on the exchange of prisoners. Disagreement on
this issue thus became the major obstacle which was not overcome until
the truce was signed nearly 20 months later. The Communists insisted on
repatriation to their native land of all NKPA and CCF prisoners held
by the United Nations Command. More than 60,000 of the 132,000 enemy
captives held by the UNC in South Korean POW camps did not wish to
return to Communism, a fact which had been borne out by a UN survey.
To draw attention from this unpopular position the Communists, through
the civil and military links existing in the POW camps, had staged a
series of riots in the spring of 1952. The worst, at Koje Island (just
off the coast of Pusan) lasted six days, largely because the Communist
prisoners planned for, and successfully carried out, the capture of the
UN camp commander. His release, on 12 May, was effected only after the
new commander signed, under duress, a statement which the Communists
immediately exploited in an effort to discredit the validity of the
prisoner survey.
The propaganda gains had enabled the Communists to occupy a commanding
position at the truce talks. In the meantime, the UN had offered
several plans until, on 28 April, Admiral Joy presented “what we called
our final package proposal.”[308] By instituting the tactic of calling
a recess whenever the Communists had nothing constructive to offer, a
recommendation of Admiral Joy’s, the UN regained the advantage of the
conference table. The talks continued but with no appreciable progress.
On 8 October 1952, after continued Communist intransigence, Brigadier
General William K. Harrison, who had become the senior UN delegate
in late May, took the initiative in recessing the truce talks. This
unexpected action, which caught the enemy off-guard, followed three
separate proposals made by Harrison for ending the POW controversy.
All had been promptly rejected by the Communist delegation. As General
Harrison had informed one of its spokesmen, the North Korean General
Nam Il:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account